2017
DOI: 10.3390/w9060406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streamflow Forecasting Using Empirical Wavelet Transform and Artificial Neural Networks

Abstract: Accurate and reliable streamflow forecasting plays an important role in various aspects of water resources management such as reservoir scheduling and water supply. This paper shows the development of a novel hybrid model for streamflow forecasting and demonstrates its efficiency. In the proposed hybrid model for streamflow forecasting, the empirical wavelet transform (EWT) is firstly employed to eliminate the redundant noises from the original streamflow series. Secondly, the partial autocorrelation function … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, DDM, which are basically numerical and based on biological neuron systems, recently known as an artificial brain or intelligence, have received more attention in water related applications because of their ease, fast progress time, and less data necessity. The ANN-or data-driven models have become increasingly popular in hydrologic forecasting because they are effective at dealing with the nonlinear characteristics of hydrological data [16]. Among the various machine learning methods, artificial neural networks (ANNs), which include back-propagation neural network (BPNN), radial basis function (RBF) neural network, generalized regression neural network (GRNN), Elman neural network, and multilayer feed-forward (MLFF) network, are among the most popular techniques for hydrological time series forecasting [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DDM, which are basically numerical and based on biological neuron systems, recently known as an artificial brain or intelligence, have received more attention in water related applications because of their ease, fast progress time, and less data necessity. The ANN-or data-driven models have become increasingly popular in hydrologic forecasting because they are effective at dealing with the nonlinear characteristics of hydrological data [16]. Among the various machine learning methods, artificial neural networks (ANNs), which include back-propagation neural network (BPNN), radial basis function (RBF) neural network, generalized regression neural network (GRNN), Elman neural network, and multilayer feed-forward (MLFF) network, are among the most popular techniques for hydrological time series forecasting [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANN, as a postprocessing method, can determine the complex relationships between the inputs and outputs. ANN has been widely used in the hydrology and modeling of water resource systems [5,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Bias Correction Of Real-time Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANN is more practical than other techniques due its ability to handle complex nonlinear systems. In previous studies, ANN was applied for various purposes such as precipitation estimation [13][14][15], hydrological modeling [16][17][18][19], hydrometeorological studies [20,21], flood forecasting [22][23][24] and flood inundation [25,26]. Three new hybrid artificial intelligence optimization models (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with cultural (ANFIS-CA), bees (ANFIS-BA), and invasive weed optimization (ANFIS-IWO) algorithms) were presented for flood susceptibility mapping in Iran.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies used Multi-Layer Neural Networks, Support Vector Regression, Self-organizing Maps or other nonlinear models for discharge forecasting [37][38][39][40][41]. However, Random Forests in river flow related application were used for water level prediction [42], identification of important variables for flood prediction [43] and sediments concentration [44].…”
Section: Random Forests Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%