1997
DOI: 10.1029/96wr02839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streamflow simulation: A nonparametric approach

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper kernel estimates of the joint and conditional probability density functions are used to generate synthetic streamflow sequences. Streamflow is assumed to be a Markov process with time dependence characterized by a multivariate probability density function. Kernel methods are used to estimate this multivariate density function. Simulation proceeds by sequentially resampling from the conditional density function derived from the kernel estimate of the underlying multivariate probability d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
191
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A non-parametric approach that uses empirical distribution functions (Lall 1995) has been emerging recently, with a potential to eliminate possible problems in fitting theoretical functions to historical data samples. One of the most popular is the kernel density function, which is defined as a weighted moving average of the empirical frequency distribution of the available data (Sharma et al 1997). The result is a distribution function guaranteed to fit the historical data in the probability range for which the data are available, and this virtually eliminates the need to run the goodness-of-fit tests required for fitting theoretical distributions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A non-parametric approach that uses empirical distribution functions (Lall 1995) has been emerging recently, with a potential to eliminate possible problems in fitting theoretical functions to historical data samples. One of the most popular is the kernel density function, which is defined as a weighted moving average of the empirical frequency distribution of the available data (Sharma et al 1997). The result is a distribution function guaranteed to fit the historical data in the probability range for which the data are available, and this virtually eliminates the need to run the goodness-of-fit tests required for fitting theoretical distributions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivation of equation (3) is presented by Sharma and O'Neill [2002] and Sharma et al [1997], except a bivariate kernel that is scaled by h 1 and h 2 is presented here. Sharma and O'Neill used the full covariance matrix to scale the kernel, in a process known as sphering [Fukunaga, 1972, p. 175].…”
Section: Univariate and Conditional Kernel Density Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following in the spirit of our recent work [Lall and Sharma, 1996;Sharma et al, 1997], the purpose of this paper is to develop a nonparametric disaggregation methodology. The necessary joint probability density functions are estimated directly from the historic data using kernel density estimates.…”
Section: Since (2) Involves Linear Combinations Of Random Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%