1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00141262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streamline computations for porous media flow including gravity

Abstract: In this paper we consider porous media flow without capillary effects. We present a streamline method which includes gravity effects by operator splitting. The flow equations are treated by an IMPES method, where the pressure equation is solved by a (standard) finite element method. The saturation equation is solved by utilizing a front tracking method along streamlines of the pressure field. The effects of gravity are accounted for in a separate correction step. This is the first time streamlines are combined… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
105
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To take into account the gravity segregation effects, we introduce an additional operator splitting for the transport equations as described at the end of Section 3. This operator splitting method was first introduced within streamline simulation [3,4,2], but can also offer certain benefits for finite-volume methods, e.g., as discussed in [9]. The segregation residual equations for water and polymer are given by…”
Section: Discretization and Splitting Of The Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take into account the gravity segregation effects, we introduce an additional operator splitting for the transport equations as described at the end of Section 3. This operator splitting method was first introduced within streamline simulation [3,4,2], but can also offer certain benefits for finite-volume methods, e.g., as discussed in [9]. The segregation residual equations for water and polymer are given by…”
Section: Discretization and Splitting Of The Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is described, amongst others, by Gmelig-Meyling (1990,1991) and Bratvedt et al (1996). In Jessen et al (2004), we developed an adaptation of gravity operator splitting for compositional problems.…”
Section: Operator Splitting For Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these shortcomings of streamline methods are well-known, and solution strategies have been proposed. For example, operator splitting techniques have been developed to account for gravity as in Bratvedt et al (1996), and for capillary flow as in Berenblyum et al (2003) and high streamline densities can in cases alleviate mapping errors. In compositional simulation, however, numerical solutions are much more sensitive to errors because of the strong nonlinear couplings introduced by the phase behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That will move streamlines and generate transverse flux. However we can take into account for gravity segregations 4 and capillary effects 9 using an operator splitting method recently, the transverse flux because of incompressible flow has not been solved well. In conventional simulators the pressure and saturation will be solved on the grid block coordinate.…”
Section: Transverse Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Technically, the oil industry literature on streamtubes dates back to the 1930's, but the three-dimensional streamline approaches are much more recent. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Many of the features that we take for granted in finite difference simulation are still missing from streamline approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%