Street-level bureaucrats: tensions and challenges in online placemaking

Abstract

Purpose Social media have become a key part of placemaking. Placemaking revolves around collaboration between multiple stakeholders, which requires ongoing two-way communication between local government and citizens. Although social media offer promising tools for local governments and public professionals in placemaking, they have not lived up to their potential. This paper aims to uncover the tensions and challenges that social media bring for public professionals at the street level in placemaking processes. Design/methodology/approach This study aims to fill this gap with a case study of area brokers engaged in online placemaking in Amsterdam. In total, 14 in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, focusing on area brokers’ social media practices, perceptions and challenges. The authors used an open coding strategy in the first phase of coding. In the second phase, the authors regrouped codes in thematic categories with the use of sensitizing concepts derived from the theoretical review. Findings The use of social media for placemaking imposes demands on area brokers from three sides: the bureaucracy, the affordances of social media and affective publics. The paper unpacks pressures area brokers are under and the (emotional) labour they carry out to align policy and bureaucratic requirements with adequate communication needed in neighbourhood affairs on social media. The tensions and the multidimensionality of what is required explain the reluctance of area brokers to exploit the potential of social media in their work. Originality/value Several studies have addressed the use of social media in placemaking, but all neglected the perspective of street-level bureaucrats who shape the placemaking process in direct contact with citizens.

A Narrative Literature Review Using Placemaking Theories to Unravel Student Social Connectedness in Hybrid University Learning Environments

“…Chayko [44] also recognises the benefits of encouraging identity development in online communities to help develop feelings of safety and escape discrimination. Yet the study by Breek et al [76] recognises the challenges with two-way communication in online communities, and highlights a need for some level of institutional support. This is supported by the study of Lischer et al [60], with faculty training being advocated to help transition towards a hybrid style of learning.…”

“…It offers an insightful perspective on the role of affectivity in placemaking and expands placemaking beyond geographical proximity, but the research does not help to understand how to apply or accommodate the digital aspects of the HULE. In online placemaking, the study by Breek et al [76] recognises the challenges with two-way communication in online communities, but they offer little insight into how to unravel this. Swist and Kuswara [2] also recognise the challenge of arranging personal, social, and material affordances to accommodate the digital aspect of the HULE, and there appear to be enormous benefits of applying 'affective' frameworks to the learning environment, as it opens insight to include spatial aspects with experience [16,68].…”

Bureaucratic Neutrality Index in Direct Regional Head Elections: Optimism in Developing Professional Bureaucracy in Indonesia

“…The position of head of bureaucracy in representing the people suggests that the bureaucracy must be led by the people's representative to accommodate their interests in daily activities (Gnoffo, 2021;van Warden, 2015). The use of social media may offer benefits in policy making since it potentially forces policymakers on three aspects: bureaucracy, affordability of social media, and affective public (Breek et al, 2021). Social media may increase public involvement in public policies (Zavattaro & Brainard, 2019), as well as policy setting agenda (Aldaihani & Shin, 2022; Alonso-Muñoz & Casero-Ripollés, 2018; Feezell, 2018;Su & Borah, 2019;Triantafillidou et al, 2020).…”