1982
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(82)90139-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Street level versus rooftop sampling: Carbon monoxide and aerosol in New York city

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kumar et al (2008b) investigated the existence of exponential relationship for vertical profile of PNC samples for three different heights of 0.20 m, 1.0 m and 2.60 m and applied an exponential variation to the daily averaged PNC data. Other studies conform to these observations for the gaseous pollutants also (Bauman et al, 1982;Boddy et al, 2005;Zoumakis, 1995). For example, Zoumakis (1995) studied the average vertical profile concentration of gaseous pollutants through experimental measurements vertically in the Patision street canyon in Athens.…”
Section: Exposure Implications Due To Flow and Dispersion Around Babymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Kumar et al (2008b) investigated the existence of exponential relationship for vertical profile of PNC samples for three different heights of 0.20 m, 1.0 m and 2.60 m and applied an exponential variation to the daily averaged PNC data. Other studies conform to these observations for the gaseous pollutants also (Bauman et al, 1982;Boddy et al, 2005;Zoumakis, 1995). For example, Zoumakis (1995) studied the average vertical profile concentration of gaseous pollutants through experimental measurements vertically in the Patision street canyon in Athens.…”
Section: Exposure Implications Due To Flow and Dispersion Around Babymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Several studies have considered the vertical gradient of carbon monoxide in heavy traffic streets (Zoumakis 1995;Väkevä et al 1999;Pfeffer et al 1995;Vardoulakis et al 2002;Scotto di Marco et al 2005;Qin and Kot 1993;Bauman et al 1982). In all this work it was systematically found a decrease in CO concentration with height, although the magnitude of the change was extremely dependent upon the characteristics of the sampling place and the atmospheric conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…5 Extensive research has been launched in recent years to study the wind flow and pollutant dispersion characteristics in street canopy. 6 These studies are referred to concentration gradients of pollutants in street canyons via measurements, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] micrometeorology of street canyons, 16 -20 and development of mathematical models describing the pollutant's profile, taking into consideration other parameters that affect the concentration levels. 21,22 Studies conducted on the dispersion of vehicular emissions in street canyons have shown that variation in concentration at a given height depends on several factors, including vehicle-generated turbulence, variation in traffic flow, meteorological parameters, and geometry of the street, such as the street orientation and aspect ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Street measurements are influenced by local conditions, and care must be taken in the interpretation of the results, in the estimation of urban air pollution levels, and in the comparison of air quality in different cities. 5,11 However, there is limited information available for both street-level concentrations and vertical gradients, and more data are clearly needed for the characterization of concentrations and air quality conditions in urban areas and especially in urban street canyons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%