2009
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2009)21:1(10)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength and Stiffness of All-Timber Pegged Connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyses of timber joint mechanics range across analytical, numerical, and experimental methods. Some focus on validation between experimental and numerical methods (Lang and Fodor, 2007;Guan et al, 2008), while others use a variety of analytical models that are compared against physical tests (Schmidt and Mackay, 1997;Shanks and Walker, 2009;Shope, 2016;Fang and Mueller, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses of timber joint mechanics range across analytical, numerical, and experimental methods. Some focus on validation between experimental and numerical methods (Lang and Fodor, 2007;Guan et al, 2008), while others use a variety of analytical models that are compared against physical tests (Schmidt and Mackay, 1997;Shanks and Walker, 2009;Shope, 2016;Fang and Mueller, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural analysis of each is necessary, and creation of models with structural analysis software makes this possible during the design stage. Research efforts to model traditional TF structural performance have primarily focused on the behavior of mortise-andtenon joints (Erikson and Schmidt 2003;Shanks and Walker 2009;Bulleit et al 1999). Structural modeling of whole-system TFs, however, has not been performed and presented in the literature as for LFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bearing capacity of mortise and tenon joints is a function of the angle of the connection, and length of the toe and mortise depth [1,14,17]. The lack of knowledge about this particular joint is determinant in the assessment of the load carrying capacity of existing wooden structures [9,31,4,5]. Here, the objective are to quantify the strength capacity of the joint by physical testing of full-scale specimens, to validate the possible usage of semi and non-destructive testing techniques to predict the joint properties and the joint effectiveness and to validate the adequacy of an anisotropic failure criterion to represent the behaviour of the joint by the comparison between experimental and numerical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%