2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength-based regularization length in phase field fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it was found that this relation remains verified even under opening, in-plane or out-of-plane shear mode loadings (Molnár et al 2020;Molnár et al 2024). Based on this finding, one way to define the strength surface in PF models consists in adapting the regularization length depending on the local stress state to follow the desired strength surface (Doitrand et al 2023b). Kumar et al (2020) explicitly defined the strength surface as an input parameter of the PF model, in addition to the critical ERR and the regularization length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, it was found that this relation remains verified even under opening, in-plane or out-of-plane shear mode loadings (Molnár et al 2020;Molnár et al 2024). Based on this finding, one way to define the strength surface in PF models consists in adapting the regularization length depending on the local stress state to follow the desired strength surface (Doitrand et al 2023b). Kumar et al (2020) explicitly defined the strength surface as an input parameter of the PF model, in addition to the critical ERR and the regularization length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These confrontations highlighted the question whether initial phase-field boundary conditions should be prescribed or not to accurately represent crack intiation at a singularity. For instance, it was evidenced that initial phase field boundary conditions were required in order to retrieve Griffith's solution in the case of a sufficiently long crack (Molnár et al 2020) or to retrieve the CC in the case of a V-notch (Doitrand et al 2023b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Depending on the kind of analysis, this internal length can be viewed either as a numerical parameter that has to tend to 0 within the framework of brittle fracture and Γ-convergence, or as a material parameter that is related to either a microstructural feature, the Irwin length or the characteristic size of a process zone. 6,8 Either way, apart from a few exceptions such as geomaterials or woven fibers composites who can have a relatively large microstructures compared to the size of the structure of interest, the internal length is very small. Since this length influences the gradient of the phase field (i.e., the damage variable), the discretization generally has to be very small, thus leading to very expensive numerical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dimensional analysis as well as more detailed analysis of specific phase field models establish a link between the energy propagation criterion of the Griffith theory, the stress threshold and the phase field internal length 3 . Depending on the kind of analysis, this internal length can be viewed either as a numerical parameter that has to tend to 0 within the framework of brittle fracture and normalΓ$$ \Gamma $$‐convergence, or as a material parameter that is related to either a microstructural feature, the Irwin length or the characteristic size of a process zone 6,8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may lead to the assumption that the characteristic length is a numerical parameter that should be chosen small enough. However, a significant influence of the characteristic length on the results was observed by Zhang et al 28 Thus, these claims are debatable and the characteristic length should be a fixed material parameter 29‐34 . A somewhat simple discussion of the meaning of the characteristic length in the phase‐field models can be found in Reference 7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%