2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2016.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength development in soft marine clay stabilized by fly ash and calcium carbide residue based geopolymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, many non-traditional stabilizing compounds have a proprietary chemical composition, which makes it difficult to evaluate the chemical stabilizing mechanisms that may occur for a given soil type, and which also consequently makes it difficult to predict their performance for use as a soil stabilizer in practice. In recent years, a number of researchers have reported on engineering property improvement of soils stabilized with non-traditional calcium-based additives (e.g., Horpibulsuk et al, 2012Horpibulsuk et al, , 2013Hossain and Mol, 2011;Kampala and Horpibulsuk, 2013;Latifi et al, 2016aLatifi et al, , 2016cMarto et al, 2014;Peethamparan et al, 2008;Sukmak et al, 2013;Turkoz et al, 2014;Phetchuay et al, 2016 andPhummiphan et al, 2015). Little information is readily available on the corresponding mineralogical, morphological, molecular and microfabric characteristics of high swelling and non-swelling low strength clays that are stabilized with non-traditional additives; this information is essential for understanding the chemical stabilization mechanisms that are involved with non-traditional additives (Tingle et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many non-traditional stabilizing compounds have a proprietary chemical composition, which makes it difficult to evaluate the chemical stabilizing mechanisms that may occur for a given soil type, and which also consequently makes it difficult to predict their performance for use as a soil stabilizer in practice. In recent years, a number of researchers have reported on engineering property improvement of soils stabilized with non-traditional calcium-based additives (e.g., Horpibulsuk et al, 2012Horpibulsuk et al, , 2013Hossain and Mol, 2011;Kampala and Horpibulsuk, 2013;Latifi et al, 2016aLatifi et al, , 2016cMarto et al, 2014;Peethamparan et al, 2008;Sukmak et al, 2013;Turkoz et al, 2014;Phetchuay et al, 2016 andPhummiphan et al, 2015). Little information is readily available on the corresponding mineralogical, morphological, molecular and microfabric characteristics of high swelling and non-swelling low strength clays that are stabilized with non-traditional additives; this information is essential for understanding the chemical stabilization mechanisms that are involved with non-traditional additives (Tingle et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to strengthening/stabilization, FA significantly improves the resistance of soil to the absorption of water. Various OPC‐free CCR–FA mixtures were trialed to enhance the strength of a problematic silty clay in Thailand, for problematic soil stabilization, soft marine clay stabilization, and for the manufacture of nonbearing masonry units . Nonbearing masonry units were also experimentally made from CCR in mixtures with WTS; a type of debris with a high content of SiO 2 .…”
Section: Sustainable Access Usage and Recycling Of Calcium Carbidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geopolymerization is possible even in the case of glass powder as as ource of silica. [166] In addition to strengthening/stabilization,F As ignificantly improves the resistance of soil to the absorption of water.V arious OPC-free CCR-FAm ixtures weret rialed to enhance the strength of ap roblematic silty clay in Thailand, [150] for problematic soil stabilization, [150,167] soft marine clays tabilization, [168] and for the manufacture of nonbearing masonry units. [169] Nonbearing masonry units werea lso experimentally made from CCR [150] FA [150] Silty clay [150] Hydrated lime [150] BA [151] Rice husk [152] Biomass ash [153] OPC [154] WTS [155] Bottoma sh [156] [155] The CCR-FAm ixtures provedt ob es trong enough to transform demolition waste (concrete aggregates,c rushed bricks, etc.)…”
Section: Calcium Carbidef or Ahealthyenvironment And Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent studies, however, one of the typical geopolymers based on fly ash has lower initial strength characteristics compared to Portland cement, due to its slow and time-dependent strength gain rate [97,101], so heat-curing treatments to increase strength lead to in situ geotechnical limitations [96]. Despite a numbers of studies having been conducted to verify the strengthening efficiency of geopolymers compared to cement-based methodologies, further research about standards for testing and production, including the generalization of the water/geopolymer ratio, the Si/Al and Na/Al ratios, and the bond between reinforcement and geopolymer paste, are required for reliable in situ applications [100].…”
Section: Geopolymersmentioning
confidence: 99%