1991
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(91)90413-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength optimization of laminated composites with respect to layer thickness and/or layer orientation angle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as in Zhu et al (2017), Hyer and Charette (1987), Kriechbaum et al (1992), Reuschel and Mattheck (1999), Tosh and Kelly (2000), and Crosky et al (2006). Work on optimum design problems for material orientations that formally take strengths into account can also be found in the literature (Fukunaga and Vanderplaats 1991;Groenwold and Haftka 2006;Hammer and Pedersen 1996;Park et al 2001;Kathiravan and Ganguli 2007;Topal and Uzman 2008). The basic approach in these papers was to select appropriate failure criteria, formulate a problem which take these criteria into account and then solve it using numerical optimisation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…as in Zhu et al (2017), Hyer and Charette (1987), Kriechbaum et al (1992), Reuschel and Mattheck (1999), Tosh and Kelly (2000), and Crosky et al (2006). Work on optimum design problems for material orientations that formally take strengths into account can also be found in the literature (Fukunaga and Vanderplaats 1991;Groenwold and Haftka 2006;Hammer and Pedersen 1996;Park et al 2001;Kathiravan and Ganguli 2007;Topal and Uzman 2008). The basic approach in these papers was to select appropriate failure criteria, formulate a problem which take these criteria into account and then solve it using numerical optimisation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimisation methodologies can be used to tailor composites to specific structural requirements, for example stiffness (Foldager et al 1998;Lund and Stegmann 2005;Setoodeh et al 2006;Ferreira et al 2014;Ferreira and Hernandes 2015;Muramatsu and Shimoda 2019), strength (Schmit and Farshi 1973;Fukunaga and Vanderplaats 1991;Groenwold and Haftka 2006;Lund 2017), buckling load (Hu 1994;Lindgaard and Lund 2011;Kaveh et al 2019), natural frequency (Abdalla et al 2007;Karakaya and Soykasap 2011;Koide and Luersen 2013) and layer delamination (Hohe and Becker 2002;Ferreira et al 2011). An optimisation process can be classified as constant stiffness design, which according to Ghiasi et al (2009) deals with composite laminates with a uniform stacking sequence throughout the entire structure, or variable stiffness design (Ghiasi et al 2010), where the stacking sequence varies through the structural domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is to find the design resulting in the minimum value for an undesired feature or response of the structure or the maximum value for a desired feature. Accordingly, in some of the studies, the goal was to minimize laminate thickness, 12,17,35,38,59,60,64,83,84,110,129,136,143,155,157,165,170,174,188,191,206,211,225,234,253,254,259,265,267,268,282,286,293,315,317,319,333,343345,350,351,360,379,380,387,396,408,410,411,415,428,438,498,501,505,535,539,541,592,595,617,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g., Le or the optimization of ply thicknesses (like Fukunaga and Vanderplaats 1991;Omkar et al 2008) lead to problems with partially discrete search space. Stochastic optimizers like EAs are employed there (Adali et al 2003;Lopez et al 2009;Naik et al 2008;Akbulut and Sonmez 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%