2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl081634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthened Indian Summer Monsoon Precipitation Susceptibility Linked to Dust‐Induced Ice Cloud Modification

Abstract: A growing body of research has underscored the radiative impact of mineral dust in influencing Indian summer monsoon rainfall variability. However, the various aerosol‐cloud‐precipitation interaction mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we analyze multisatellite observations to examine dust‐induced modification in ice clouds and precipitation susceptibility. We show contrasting dust‐induced changes in ice cloud regimes wherein despite a 25% reduction in ice particle radius in thin ice clouds, we find ~40%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ACI studies often use satellite retrievals to take advantage of their global coverage, but satellites have been unable to measure the CCN. Nevertheless, the aerosol optical parameters such as aerosol optical depth (AOD) and aerosol index (AI) are commonly used as proxies for CCN in previous studies (Gryspeerdt & Stier, 2012;Patel et al, 2017Patel et al, , 2019Patel & Kumar, 2016;Quaas et al, 2008Quaas et al, , 2009Rosenfeld, 2008). However, all these proxies are crude tools and suffer from various issues such as aerosol swelling, lack of vertical information, cloud contamination, uncertainty in size distribution and solubility, and more (Rosenfeld et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACI studies often use satellite retrievals to take advantage of their global coverage, but satellites have been unable to measure the CCN. Nevertheless, the aerosol optical parameters such as aerosol optical depth (AOD) and aerosol index (AI) are commonly used as proxies for CCN in previous studies (Gryspeerdt & Stier, 2012;Patel et al, 2017Patel et al, , 2019Patel & Kumar, 2016;Quaas et al, 2008Quaas et al, , 2009Rosenfeld, 2008). However, all these proxies are crude tools and suffer from various issues such as aerosol swelling, lack of vertical information, cloud contamination, uncertainty in size distribution and solubility, and more (Rosenfeld et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levin et al (2005) found that an increase in IN concentration induced by dust can reduce the collision efficiency between liquid droplets and further weaken cumulus precipitation in the Mediterranean region. Dust concentration within clouds, cloud type, cloud height and meteorological conditions lead to big changes and even mutations or reversals in dust-cloud interactions (Wielicki et al 1996, Zelinka et al 2014, Fan et al 2016, Wang et al 2018, Liu et al 2019, Patel et al 2019. Moreover, under certain water vapour conditions, an increase in dust aerosols can reduce the effective radius of cloud droplets, increase the cloud albedo, change the cloud lifetime, and indirectly lead to the enhancement of reflected radiation and a decrease in surface temperature (Han et al 2008, Sun et al 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current version of the simulator package comprises the ISCCP (Klein and Jakob, 1999;Webb et al, 2001), MODIS (Pincus et al, 2012), MISR (Marchand and Ackerman, 2010), PARASOL (Konsta et al, 2016), CloudSat (Haynes et al, 2007), and CALIPSO (Chepfer et al, 2008;Cesana and Chepfer, 2012) simulators. To effectively utilize these capabilities, there is a growing need for "processoriented" model diagnostics (Maloney et al, 2019), which have been recognized as essential to the community effort to advance climate modeling (Tsushima et al, 2017;Webb et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate microphysics at a fundamental process level, it is best to analyze the instantaneous output for the variables of interest rather than their monthly means (e.g., Konsta et al, 2016). This is because these processes typically occur over short timescales ("fast processes") and contribute to the regime dependency of important phenomena including aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions (Michibata et al, 2016;Patel et al, 2019). This requires highfrequency data output ( ∼ 6 hourly) from COSP (see also Tsushima et al, 2017), which results in large amounts of data, particularly when subcolumn (pixel-scale) variables, such as a radar or lidar simulator, are involved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%