Strengthening Borders, Managing Centres: Reception Conditions and Provisions of Services to Asylum Seekers in Croatia

Abstract

This article analyses the impact that the Common European Asylum System may have on asylum seekers residing in reception centres within Croatia, as well as more recent challenges related to increased asylum seekers' numbers and difficulties they might pose for the reception standards and provision of services. We posit that a degree of variation occurs in the treatment of asylum seekers throughout reception centres in the EU. The analysis sheds light on the Croatian asylum reception system, one that had been legally obligated to fully harmonise its policies with the EU acquis during the EU accession process. Based on the field research in the form of semi-structured interviews among the stakeholders and asylum seekers at the Reception Centre for Asylum Seekers Kutina in 2016, the findings will demonstrate that although Croatia has fully adapted its regulations to the Reception Conditions Directive, there are still issues regarding the minimum standards of quality of reception, service provision and future integration of protection claimants. The authors contend that gaps and insufficiencies in the reception conditions and standards are directly decreasing asylum seekers' future prospects by affecting their chances of integration into Croatian society and resulting in significant secondary movement of these migrants to other EU countries. Even more, in the aftermath of the Balkan corridor, the present challenges of increased numbers of asylum applicants are calling for the planning of new and proper reception facilities, which is difficult to accomplish in the context of overtly securitised asylum and migration policies.

Exclusion, Minimization, Inaction: A Critical Review of Ireland's Policy Response to Gender-Based Violence as It Affects Migrant Women

“…Significantly, Oliveira et al (2018) problematize professionals' "SGBV conceptualization" as a factor in "the potential perpetuation of violence" (p. 10), especially their failure to recognize adverse socio-economic conditions and related forms of exploitation and harmful practices as forms of SGBV. Another emerging literature analyses policy implementation deficiencies at state and local level, especially relating to "vulnerable migrants" as symptomatic of problems of "multilevel governance" (Spehar et al, 2017;Pandek and Župarić-Iljić, 2018;Marti, 2019;Thouez, 2019;Campomori and Ambrosini, 2020). The latter literature foregrounds the importance of recognizing that effective policy response involves an array of actors-state and non-state actors-operating in context specific configurations, vertically and horizontally, at local, national and international levels.…”