2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/9210827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening Effect of Prestressed Near‐Surface‐Mounted CFRP Tendon on Reinforced Concrete Beam

Abstract: Efforts are being made to use FRP (fiber-reinforced polymer) for reinforcements instead of traditional construction materials like steel owing to its remarkable mechanical properties. Among them, this study developed a CFRP tendon to be used as near-surface-mounted reinforcement together with a dedicated prestressing system and investigates experimentally the strengthening effect considering various variables including the amount of reinforcement, the bond performance, and the strength and damage ratio of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6b shows the residual strength of the specimens after fatigue loading. The results are seen to be nearly identical to those obtained in a previous work [23] in which static loading was applied without preliminary fatigue loading. When static loading is applied without accumulation of fatigue, the load-deflection curve presents three distinct behaviors that are the crack behavior, the yield behavior and the fatigue behavior.…”
Section: Test Rsultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Figure 6b shows the residual strength of the specimens after fatigue loading. The results are seen to be nearly identical to those obtained in a previous work [23] in which static loading was applied without preliminary fatigue loading. When static loading is applied without accumulation of fatigue, the load-deflection curve presents three distinct behaviors that are the crack behavior, the yield behavior and the fatigue behavior.…”
Section: Test Rsultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…e greater confinement granted by the adhesive and the surrounding concrete is considered the best advantage provided by the NSM method [2]. is strengthening technique has already been proven to be effective for the shear strengthening [3][4][5][6] and flexural strengthening of RC beams [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Many studies have used conventional steel bars instead of FRP materials for beam strengthening by employing the NSM method [21,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have applied the NSM FRP strengthening method to improve the flexural and shear strength of RC beams [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], whilst others have used conventional steel bars instead of FRP materials for flexural and shear strengthening [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. However, only few of these studies have focused on torsion strengthening [29][30][31]32] and no previous work has investigated the application of conventional steel bars for the torsion strengthening of RC beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e greater confinement granted by the adhesive and the surrounding concrete is considered the best advantage offered by the NSM method [41]. is strengthening technique has already been proven to be effective for the shear and flexural strengthening of RC beams [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. Many studies have also used conventional steel bars instead of FRP materials for flexural and shear strengthening by employing the NSM method [59][60][61][62][63][64].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%