2013
DOI: 10.1111/fare.12029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening Incarcerated Families: Evaluating a Pilot Program for Children of Incarcerated Parents and Their Caregivers

Abstract: Parental incarceration can be devastating for families. Children may experience difficulties, and the stress on caregivers who take on unexpected childrearing is high. We implemented and evaluated a family-level intervention with caregivers and children experiencing parental (typically maternal) incarceration, in a community setting. We partnered with a community-based organization serving families with an incarcerated parent to conduct a pilot trial of the Strengthening Families Program (SFP). Process evaluat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the studies included in this review described the transient nature of the prison population as a primary concern and highlighted that traditional methods for delivering parenting programs (i.e., the tendency for delivery to be in a sequential manner, where each element builds upon previously delivered content) may not be practical, nor best practice in the prison context. Within the studies in this review, Miller et al ( 2013 ) and Sandifer ( 2008 ) suggest adapting programs so that sessions can be delivered on a stand-alone basis rather than requiring continuity in attendance may mitigate some of the difficulties. Adopting a flexible delivery approach would allow for continuous recruitment to the program, thereby maximizing sustainability; it would enable parents to participate irrespective of the length of their sentence; and, it would also allow parents who miss sessions due to scheduling conflicts (e.g., court attendance) to continue with their engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, the studies included in this review described the transient nature of the prison population as a primary concern and highlighted that traditional methods for delivering parenting programs (i.e., the tendency for delivery to be in a sequential manner, where each element builds upon previously delivered content) may not be practical, nor best practice in the prison context. Within the studies in this review, Miller et al ( 2013 ) and Sandifer ( 2008 ) suggest adapting programs so that sessions can be delivered on a stand-alone basis rather than requiring continuity in attendance may mitigate some of the difficulties. Adopting a flexible delivery approach would allow for continuous recruitment to the program, thereby maximizing sustainability; it would enable parents to participate irrespective of the length of their sentence; and, it would also allow parents who miss sessions due to scheduling conflicts (e.g., court attendance) to continue with their engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the studies included in this review highlighted the important role played by facilitators as they were found to impact the way recipients responded to the program (LaRosa and Rank 2001 ; Meek 2007 ; Rossiter et al 2015 ) and were considered essential in the management of group dynamics (Miller et al 2013 ). Previous research has described the strength of the relationship between facilitators and recipients as having a profound impact on initial and prolonged engagement in parenting programs (Fixsen et al 2005 ; McPherson et al 2017 ) as well as being associated with better treatment outcomes (Marsh et al 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Satisfaction was measured using an SFP survey (Kumpfer et al, 1989; Miller et al, 2013). Questions included whether the participant would recommend the program, whether the group leader cared about the participant, and how much participants believed the class had helped them.…”
Section: Study Design and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content and logistics were tailored to address mothers' interests and the nature of this setting and parenting attitudes were assessed pre- and post-intervention. The “Parenting While Incarcerated” (PWI) curriculum was based on an existing evidence-based parenting intervention (the Strengthening Families Program; SFP; Kumpfer, DeMarsh, & Child, 1989) previously used with caregivers of children with incarcerated parents (Miller et al, 2013). This work was conducted in partnership with a community agency serving families with an incarcerated parent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%