2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening insights into host responses to mastitis infection in ruminants by combining heterogeneous microarray data sources

Abstract: BackgroundGene expression profiling studies of mastitis in ruminants have provided key but fragmented knowledge for the understanding of the disease. A systematic combination of different expression profiling studies via meta-analysis techniques has the potential to test the extensibility of conclusions based on single studies. Using the program Pointillist, we performed meta-analysis of transcription-profiling data from six independent studies of infections with mammary gland pathogens, including samples from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(80 reference statements)
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meta-analysis approaches are used to combine or integrate information from independent studies to overcome low statistical power in studies and identify common results to increase confidence in the generality of information [22]. In the present study meta-analysis was used to combine information across samples and time-points, which identified 17 differentially expressed genes (Figure 5) which are involved in five pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meta-analysis approaches are used to combine or integrate information from independent studies to overcome low statistical power in studies and identify common results to increase confidence in the generality of information [22]. In the present study meta-analysis was used to combine information across samples and time-points, which identified 17 differentially expressed genes (Figure 5) which are involved in five pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of these approaches for dairy ruminants transcriptome profiling has identified genes, pathways and regulatory networks activated in mammary tissues during experimental infection by various pathogens, including E. coli , S. aureus and S. uberis [10,17-21]. The meta-analysis of transcription-profiling data from six independent studies of the mammary gland infected with different pathogens identified common signatures of infection among species and that were characteristic of early vs late stage responses [22]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratios of common proteins and immune-related proteins between samples at different SCC levels (SCC1 = <10 5 cells/mL; SCC2 = 2.5 × 10 5 cells/mL; SCC3 = 4 × 10 5 cells/mL; SCC4 = 7.5 × 10 5 cells/mL; SCC5 = 10 6 cells/mL) from cows with mastitis (Moyes et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2014). These changes in concentration of cellular function proteins were related to the immune response to mastitis infection (Genini et al, 2011). Because the complement regulatory protein CD59 can protect the mammary gland from overactivated complement medi- Figure 3.…”
Section: Downregulated Proteins In Milk From Cows With High Sccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct comparison of the induced transcriptional responses identified in these studies is difficult because of differences in the experimental design and the microarray platforms used. However, meta-analyses of such transcriptional studies have recently been reported [8,9]. The meta-analysis reported by Genini et al [8] identified a common transcriptional response in the mammary glands of several species to different pathogens and identified several new pathways not previously identified in the individual studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, meta-analyses of such transcriptional studies have recently been reported [8,9]. The meta-analysis reported by Genini et al [8] identified a common transcriptional response in the mammary glands of several species to different pathogens and identified several new pathways not previously identified in the individual studies. However, a considerable amount of information was excluded from this meta-analysis because of the limited overlap of probes included on the microarrays used in the original studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%