2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening mechanisms and modelling of mechanical properties of submicron-TiB2 particulate reinforced Al 7075 metal matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the n-HMMC showed the highest porosity following MMC, s-HMMC, and the base alloy. The same trend was mentioned in references [ 18 , 52 , 58 , 59 ]. The increase in porosity was due to the improper mixing of the reinforcement particles and the matrix, as shown in Figure 7 b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Hence, the n-HMMC showed the highest porosity following MMC, s-HMMC, and the base alloy. The same trend was mentioned in references [ 18 , 52 , 58 , 59 ]. The increase in porosity was due to the improper mixing of the reinforcement particles and the matrix, as shown in Figure 7 b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Similar observations were also reported by Xiang et al 49 and Sahoo et al. 54 Actually, the strengthening mechanisms associated with the microstructure features of the matrix have not been quantitatively considered in this evaluation, and B 4 C particles are assumed to be solely responsible for strength enhancement. As previously stated, RE-containing precipitates in submicron size have emerged in the WE43 matrix following the hot rolling process, and their volume fraction has grown as B 4 C content increases.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The YS of hot-rolled WE43-B 4 C MMCs can be theoretically calculated using a modified Clyne model, which was originally developed to predict the strength of MMCs with micron-sized reinforcements. 54 Assuming the strengthening mechanisms are interdependent, the modified Clyne model uses the quadratic summation method to incorporate the contribution of the above-discussed strengthening mechanisms. In order to evaluate the precision of calculated σ Y c using equation (8), a comparison is conducted here with those experimental values provided in Figure 11. Figure 12(a) shows a good agreement between theoretical and experimental results, particularly at lower weight fractions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where is the strengthening coefficient (1.25 for Al [48] , [49] ), is the difference between the CTEs of the matrix and the reinforced particles, and the CTE values of the Al matrix and TiB 2 particle are 25.2 × 10 -6 /K [46] and 7.8 × 10 -6 /K [50] , respectively, so = 17.4 × 10 -6 /K; is the difference between the pouring temperature and the test temperature [51] , the pouring temperature is 993 K, and the test temperature is 298 K, so = 695 K; b is the Burger vector; is the average size of the reinforcing particles, about 200 nm in the composite with UT for 180 s. is the volume fraction of the reinforcing particles, and the mass fraction of 2 % is converted into a volume fraction of 1.2 %. is the shear modulus of the matrix, which can be calculated from the following formula [52] : …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%