Strengthening national environmental governance to promote sustainable development

Fulton, Scott C.; Wolfson, Steve

doi:10.4337/9781783470853.00007

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Not only would further ratification of the UNECE MEAs be instrumental in supporting the implementation of MEAs already ratified by BRI countries, but also help to create a level playing field (Fulton & Wolfson 2015) across the BRI corridors, whereby a consistent set of internationally accepted rules and standards promoting good governance practices is established, which creates predictability of environmental rules and standards which apply to investments (and thereby facilitate the realization of greener infrastructure) along the BRI corridors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Belt and Road Initiative in North Eurasia: Changing Geographies and the UNECE Multilateral Environmental Agreements

Cheremeteff¹,

Shvarts

Simonov³

et al. 2021

GES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched by China in 2013 to increase economic and transport connectivity along the Eurasian continent and beyond, has posed unprecedented environmental and social risks, many of which are transboundary in nature. International legal tools contained in Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) can play an important role in mitigating such transboundary risks across space and time, as well as reduce the negative impacts of large infrastructure projects, such as are being developed under the auspices of the BRI. However, the adoption of MEA policy tools has been very uneven across the continent. Three conventions in particular, the 1991 Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment, the 1998 Aarhus Convention, and the 1992 Helsinki Water Convention (the UNECE MEAs) - have the least amount of ratifications by BRI countries. In this paper we discuss these three conventions and demonstrate their relevance in addressing the transboundary risks of large infrastructure projects which require complex coordination and long-term planning.Extended ratification of these UNECE MEAs by nations along the BRI corridors should significantly assist in positively changing geographies by minimizing BRI environmental risks and threats on a transboundary and national dimension, but simultaneously (i) create a more unified approach towards sustainability across the BRI, (ii) raise involvement (and likely subsequent) support within communities for BRI projects, (iii) help to reduce related economic risks throughout Eurasia.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%