Strengthening nursing, midwifery and allied health professional leadership in the UK – a realist evaluation

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to share the findings of a realist evaluation study that set out to identify how to strengthen nursing, midwifery and allied health professions (NMAHP) leadership across all health-care contexts in the UK conducted between 2018 and 2019. The collaborative research team were from the Universities of Bangor, Ulster, the University of the West of Scotland and Canterbury Christ Church University. Design/methodology/approach Realist evaluation and appreciative inquiry were used across three phases of the study. Phase 1 analysed the literature to generate tentative programme theories about what works, tested out in Phase 2 through a national social media Twitter chat and sense-making workshops to help refine the theories in Phase 3. Cross-cutting themes were synthesised into a leadership framework identifying the strategies that work for practitioners in a range of settings and professions based on the context, mechanism and output configuration of realist evaluation. Stakeholders contributed to the ongoing interrogation, analysis and synthesis of project outcomes. Findings Five guiding lights of leadership, a metaphor for principles, were generated that enable and strengthen leadership across a range of contexts. – “The Light Between Us as interactions in our relationships”, “Seeing People’s Inner Light”, “Kindling the Spark of light and keeping it glowing”, “Lighting up the known and the yet to be known” and “Constellations of connected stars”. Research limitations/implications This study has illuminated the a-theoretical nature of the relationships between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes in the existing leadership literature. There is more scope to develop the tentative programme theories developed in this study with NMAHP leaders in a variety of different contexts. The outcomes of leadership research mostly focussed on staff outcomes and intermediate outcomes that are then linked to ultimate outcomes in both staff and patients (supplemental). More consideration needs to be given to the impact of leadership on patients, carers and their families. Practical implications The study has developed additional important resources to enable NMAHP leaders to demonstrate their leadership impact in a range of contexts through the leadership impact self-assessment framework which can be used for 360 feedback in the workplace using the appreciative assessment and reflection tool. Social implications Whilst policymakers note the increasing importance of leadership in facilitating the culture change needed to support health and care systems to adopt sustainable change at pace, there is still a prevailing focus on traditional approaches to individual leadership development as opposed to collective leadership across teams, services and systems. If this paper fails to understand how to transform leadership policy and education, then it will be impossible to support the workforce to adapt and flex to the increasingly complex contexts they are working in. This will serve to undermine system integration for health and social care if the capacity and capability for transformation are not attended to. Whilst there are ambitious global plans (WHO, 2015) to enable integrated services to be driven by citizen needs, there is still a considerable void in understanding how to authentically engage with people to ensure the transformation is driven by their needs as opposed to what the authors think they need. There is, therefore, a need for systems leaders with the full skillset required to enable integrated services across place-based systems, particularly clinicians who are able to break down barriers and silo working across boundaries through the credibility, leadership and facilitation expertise they provide. Originality/value The realist evaluation with additional synthesis from key stakeholders has provided new knowledge about the principles of effective NMAHP leadership in health and social care, presented in such a way that facilitates the use of the five guiding lights to inform further practice, education, research and policy development.

On the Nth Roots of –1 and Complex Basin Boundaries: Fractals from Newton–Raphson

“…Overall, subthemes related to both characteristics of strong midwifery leaders (n = 10) and enablers of strong midwifery leadership (n = 7), which may be useful in strengthening the midwifery profession's ability to lead in healthcare worldwide (Renfrew, 2021;WHO, 2021). Ultimately, the findings presented here add to the body of knowledge emerging in the area of strengthening midwifery leadership (Jackson et al, 2021). Findings may also contribute to enhancing existing multi-professional leadership frameworks and models in healthcare (Kaehne et al, 2022).…”

Empowering nurses: exploring self-managed organizations in Indian healthcare

“…The study also underscores the positive impact of long-term team relationships on patient satisfaction and nursing experience, emphasizing the importance of continuity of care and familial bonds in the homecare setting [55]. Additionally, SMOs cultivate a proactive and entrepreneurial mindset among nursing professionals, fostering a culture of innovation and transformative change, ultimately contributing to improved patient care and organizational excellence [56]. This strategic focus on preserving a unique work culture through training enhances job satisfaction and contributes to a more fulfilling nursing experience.…”

“…Transparent alignment evaluation emphasizes the importance of cultural fit in nursing organizations, enhancing overall cohesion and effectiveness while recognizing the delicate balance required for a rewarding nursing experience [57]. Acknowledging the principle of balancing autonomy and safeguards is crucial in SMOs, ensuring ethical practice and upholding high-quality care standards [56].…”

Embedding research (ER) led by nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs): the NMAHP-ER model

“…To meet these challenges, an NMAHP-ER model (figure 1) was codesigned between the James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (JPUH), The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (NuTH) and the University of East Anglia ImpACT Research Group. To become truly embedded, we propose a value-based approach built on interprofessional learning to achieve the transformation of and review the impact of NMAHP led research activity 13. The key foundation of the role has the individual clinician working collaboratively within the healthcare setting and in partnership with academia to develop the skills to become the ER.…”