2014
DOI: 10.1108/ejtd-11-2013-0123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening student engagement: what do students want in online courses?

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper was to identify pertinent studies on the important issue of student engagement strategies in online courses and to establish from empirical studies student engagement strategies that work. Design/methodology/approach – The paper adopted the literature review approach. The authors conducted a thorough and systematic search of the literature to find empirical studies focusing on online engagement strateg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
75
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
9
75
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This module manages the feedback that the system provides in response to a student's interaction with the AR application. Some studies have reported that the provision of feedback might have a positive effect on student motivation (Chakraborty & Muyia Nafukho, 2014;Chao et al, 2014). Thus, we suggest that providing real-time feedback might support student motivation.…”
Section: Real-time Feedback (Rfe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This module manages the feedback that the system provides in response to a student's interaction with the AR application. Some studies have reported that the provision of feedback might have a positive effect on student motivation (Chakraborty & Muyia Nafukho, 2014;Chao et al, 2014). Thus, we suggest that providing real-time feedback might support student motivation.…”
Section: Real-time Feedback (Rfe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and rewarding group interactions (Amador and Mederer ) all contribute to the creation of successful online discussions. It is imperative that the right technology is used to deliver the correct content and level of engagement (Chakraborty and Nafukho ). Lane () contends that discussions are the best way to reduce student–student and student–teacher distance and to create engagement.…”
Section: Forging Social Presencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, providing discussion grading rubrics or criteria (Swan and Shih 2005), attributing a significant grade to communitybuilding exercises (Rovai 2002), requiring netiquette standards (Anderson et al 2001), and rewarding group interactions (Amador and Mederer 2013) all contribute to the creation of successful online discussions. It is imperative that the right technology is used to deliver the correct content and level of engagement (Chakraborty and Nafukho 2014). Lane (2010) contends that discussions are the best way to reduce student-student and studentteacher distance and to create engagement.…”
Section: Forging Social Presencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…findings of this open-ended question consistently mirror the Community of Inquiry statements, however, there is certainly no consensus about "one best way" to engage students. This supports the theory that learning tools must be individualized to meet the unique needs of the students and a variety of strategies must be employed (Chakraborty & Nafukho, 2014) The final survey item answered research question seven to understand how online faculty define online student engagement. More than one-third defined engagement as active participation in all of the course components including items such as discussions, learning activities, and assessments.…”
Section: Qualitative Summary Analysismentioning
confidence: 55%