r 1997
DOI: 10.20955/r.79.41-51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening the Case for the Yield Curve as a Predictor of U.S. Recessions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
179
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
8
179
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This forecast is done estimating a probit model. Dueker (1997) confirms this result using a modified probit model which includes a lagged dependent variable. Built on these works, many papers, on the one hand, give empirical results on the fact that these evidences are present also in the major countries of the European Union and, on the other hand, they try to improve or change the model used to forecast recessions.…”
Section: Survey Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This forecast is done estimating a probit model. Dueker (1997) confirms this result using a modified probit model which includes a lagged dependent variable. Built on these works, many papers, on the one hand, give empirical results on the fact that these evidences are present also in the major countries of the European Union and, on the other hand, they try to improve or change the model used to forecast recessions.…”
Section: Survey Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In this case, Plosser and Rouwenhorst (1994) pointed out that one would expect the nominal term structure to forecast real activity better if the term structure of expected inflation is flat and stable over time rather than sloped and variable. 5 But as Dueker (1997) explains, this is depends on their assessment of the size and duration of the recession's effect on short-term interest rates.…”
Section: Yield Spread As Predictor Of Real Economic Activity: Theoretmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most recent econometric works used dynamic probit models (Duecker, 1997;Valcks et al, 2002;Moneta, 2003;Chauvet and Potter, 2005;Kauppi and Saikkonen, 2007;and Nyberg, 2008). The key difference between a dynamic and a static probit model is that the former includes, among other indicators, lagged values of the dependent variable as an explanatory variable (and potentially a leading 37 indicator).…”
Section: Recession and Growth Cycle Modeling Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%