Strengthening the human rights framework to protect breastfeeding: a focus on CEDAW

Abstract

BackgroundThere have been recent calls for increased recognition of breastfeeding as a human right. The United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 1979 (CEDAW) is the core human rights treaty on women. CEDAW’s approach to breastfeeding is considered from an historical perspective. A comparison is drawn with breastfeeding protection previously outlined in the International Labour Organization’s Maternity Protection Convention, 1919 (ILO C3), and its 1952 revision (ILO C103), and subsequently, in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989 (CRC).DiscussionDespite breastfeeding’s sex-specific significance to an international human rights treaty on women and CEDAW’s emphasis on facilitating women’s employment, CEDAW is, in reality, a relatively weak instrument for breastfeeding protection. In both its text and subsequent interpretations explicit recognition of breastfeeding is minimal or nonexistent. Explanations for this are proposed and contextualised in relation to various political, social and economic forces, especially those influencing notions of gender equality. During the mid to late 1970s -when CEDAW was formulated - breastfeeding posed a strategic challenge for key feminist goals, particularly those of equal employment opportunity, gender neutral childrearing policy and reproductive rights. Protective legislation aimed at working women had been rejected as outdated and oppressive. Moreover, the right of women to breastfeed was generally assumed, with choice over infant feeding practices often perceived as the right NOT to breastfeed. There was also little awareness or analysis of the various structural obstacles to breastfeeding’s practice, such as lack of workplace support, that undermine ‘choice’. Subsequent interpretations of CEDAW show that despite significant advances in scientific and epidemiological knowledge about breastfeeding's importance for short-term and long-term maternal health, breastfeeding continues to be inadequately addressed in international human rights law on women. A comparison is made with CRC and its subsequent elaborations. Increasing recognition of the need to protect, promote and support breastfeeding within the framework of CRC but not that of CEDAW suggests that breastfeeding is regarded primarily as a children's rights issue but only minimally as a women's rights issue.SummaryThe human rights framework requires strengthening in every direction to protect, promote and support breastfeeding. Discussion is needed regarding whether a separate strengthening of the international human rights framework on women is required with regard to breastfeeding.

Better nutrition, better lives: Countries’ positioning to fight all forms of malnutrition

“…When mentions of regulatory measures for the safeguard of healthy eating habits were made in the analyzed statements, they often noted two key factors: how necessary and relevant these measures were; and how much resistance from large companies stood in the way of their implementation. Despite overwhelming evidence linking food marketing to increased intake of unhealthy foodstuffs (26,28,32), policies that address this issue can prove challenging to enact due to economic and commercial interests (6,(29)(30)(31). Studies indicate a need for such measures to be implemented through governmental legislation, since voluntary and self-regulating agreements have proved to be of limited effectiveness (36,37).…”

“…There is evidence linking policies that facilitate transnational commerce and the ensuing increase of foreign investment with poor eating habits and proliferation of obesity and noncommunicable chronic diseases (4)(5)(6)25). There is a correlation between market policies that promote foreign direct investment and an increase in the supply and promotion of breast-milk substitutes (32,33). They also relate rising retail of processed foodstuffs to growing numbers of overweight: every additional 20 kg per capita of ultra-processed foodstuffs sold yearly leads to an increase of 0.28 points in body mass index (BMI) (5).…”

Lactancia materna: Una asignatura pendiente para el Trabajo Social

“…La literatura revisada sugiere que, en el ámbito de la lactancia materna y la salud, la mujer sufre discriminación a consecuencia de disparidades por cuestión de género, clase social, raza o nivel educativo (Edwards 2009;Galtry, 2015;Good, 2015;Hausman, 2003;Kimmel, 2007;Massó, 2013;Parrilla & Gorrín, 1999).…”

Awareness of Breastfeeding Laws and Provisions of Students and Employees of Institutions of Higher Learning in Georgia

“…Various reasons have been ascribed to the low breastfeeding rates in the United States, including lack of role model, lack of time, embarrassment to breastfeed in public, cultural preference to formula feed, and lack of support in the home and/or place of work and lack of acceptance in the general society (Anstey et al, 2018; Gross et al, 2015; Majee, Thullen, Davis, & Sethi, 2017). This may be due to a lack of knowledge of resources and rights to breastfeed at the workplace (Galtry, 2015; Majee et al, 2017).…”