2012
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980012004958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening the rigour of population-wide, community-based obesity prevention evaluations

Abstract: Objective: The aim of the present study was to review the methodological literature regarding evaluation methods for complex public health interventions broadly and, based on such methods, to critically reflect on the evaluation of contemporary community-based obesity prevention programmes. Design: A systematic review of the methods and community-based literature was performed by one reviewer. Results: The review identified that there is considerable scope to improve the rigour of community-based obesity preve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(232 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of effective governance mechanism to implement and monitor nutrition polices in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) has been identified as an ongoing challenge in previous research [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The salt reduction research project was led by C-POND, a regional research organization working on NCDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of effective governance mechanism to implement and monitor nutrition polices in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) has been identified as an ongoing challenge in previous research [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The salt reduction research project was led by C-POND, a regional research organization working on NCDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to move beyond this impasse, alternative research designs may be required to evaluate multifaceted approaches that function within a complex adaptive system (29,33,(44)(45)(46)(47). Signs of this are starting to emerge.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when support to implement policy or evidence-based programs cannot feasibly be provided to all sites or providers across the region simultaneously, research designs using a delayed or waitlist comparison group including stepped wedged (multiple baseline designs) or serial randomized controlled trial designs are used. Such designs maximize internal validity while remaining consistent with the required large-scale ''rollout'' of service delivery initiatives and address the ethical imperative of equitable access to health services [38]. For example, serial randomized trials have been used to evaluate an implementation strategy to support primary schools implement an evidence-based government policy to remove unhealthy foods from regular sale at schools canteens [39,40].…”
Section: Trials Of Strategies To Improve Implementation Of Evidence-bmentioning
confidence: 99%