Strengthening women's tenure rights and participation in community forestry in central Uganda
                     1

Mukasa, C.; Tibazalika, A.; Banana, A.Y.; Mwangi, Esther; Mutimukuru-Maravanyika, Tendayi

doi:10.4324/9781003197256-9

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 These combinations of qualitative and quantitative approaches are replicated in the work of Mukasa et al (2022) and Bomuhangi et al's (2022), qualitative and quantitative analyses of ACM impacts, respectively, in Uganda. 2 For example, Kamoto et al (2013) reported that some village heads established VFAs because they were envious of the incentives from NGOs and development partners such as irrigation equipment, boreholes, training of VNRMCS and subsequent daily subsistence allowances that go with it, among other benefits that other villages received.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 93%

An assessment of Participatory Forest Management inspired by adaptive collaborative management in Malawi

Kamoto¹,

Missanjo²,

Djenontin³

2023

Responding to Environmental Issues Through Adaptive Collaborative Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 93%

An assessment of Participatory Forest Management inspired by adaptive collaborative management in Malawi

Kamoto¹,

Missanjo²,

Djenontin³

2023

Responding to Environmental Issues Through Adaptive Collaborative Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The edited volume by Colfer, Prabhu and Larson (2021b) offers a rich discussion of ACM's theories and methods (e.g., Colfer et al, 2021a;McDougall & Ojha, 2021). Two chapters present findings from qualitative and quantitative evaluations of an ACM program in Uganda that enabled diverse communities to institutionalize access to their forests and forest resources and their participation in forest management (e.g., Mukasa et al, 2021;Bomuhangi et al, 2021). The authors also reflect on struggles, as when district officials were not much interested in bottom-up and empowering action research.…”

Section: Box 2 Gathering Momentum: Empowering Bottom-up Action Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender norms, agency, and trajectories of social change and development in agricultural communities

Petesch¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

viii 6.6 Conclusions ______________________________________________________________ Notes ______________________________________________________________________ Chapter 7. General discussion: Lessons about local normative climates __ 7.1 Revisiting the three research questions _________________________________________ Q1 How do gender and other social norms operate to shape and accommodate the diverse and changing conditions of rural communities? ___________________________________ Q2 How do the mutually shaping dynamics of gender norms and women's and men's agency advance or impede agricultural innovation in a community? _________________________ Q3 Under what conditions do local men and women observe empowerment and poverty reduction in their village? Do processes of gender-equitable agricultural innovation contribute to these outcomes? _________________________________________________________ 7.2 Building lessons with social mechanism theory __________________________________ 7.2.1 Environmental, cognitive, and relational mechanisms ______________________ 7.2.2 Framing local normative climate as a cognitive mechanism __________________ 7.3 Multi-level reflections on the transforming cases _________________________________ 7.3.1 Introduction to the MLP _____________________________________________ 7.3.2 Gender, technology, and system innovation ______________________________ 7.4 Taking LNC Forward ______________________________________________________ 7.5 Conclusion ______________________________________________________________ Notes ______________________________________________________________________ References _____________________________________________________

show abstract

Community partner viewpoints on forest partnership: why does it matter?

Rachmawan,

Acciaioli,

Djafar

et al. 2024

Environmental Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strengthening women's tenure rights and participation in community forestry in central Uganda 1

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

An assessment of Participatory Forest Management inspired by adaptive collaborative management in Malawi

An assessment of Participatory Forest Management inspired by adaptive collaborative management in Malawi

Gender norms, agency, and trajectories of social change and development in agricultural communities

Community partner viewpoints on forest partnership: why does it matter?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About