2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nurse educators in the academic setting might be chosen for their clinical rather than their teaching experience and some might have limited preparation for classroom teaching, which could have an impact on their enthusiasm and ability to teach (Wolf, Bender, Beitz, Wieland, & Vito, 2004). Academic staff do not model the "actual practice of nursing" in contrast to practice base colleagues (Felstead, 2013;p.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurse educators in the academic setting might be chosen for their clinical rather than their teaching experience and some might have limited preparation for classroom teaching, which could have an impact on their enthusiasm and ability to teach (Wolf, Bender, Beitz, Wieland, & Vito, 2004). Academic staff do not model the "actual practice of nursing" in contrast to practice base colleagues (Felstead, 2013;p.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] found that undergraduate students perceived teaching strategies, faculty enthusiasm and knowledge base, faculty support of students efforts are faculty strengths points. Also [9] found that teaching methods was chosen by students as the next most frequent characteristics of effective teacher/instructor after personality attributes.…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Of the Quality Dimensions Of All Nursimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A class where students concentrate because it is fun, and not boring 24 (13.5) A class in which students participate voluntarily and present and cooperate 20 (11.2) A class that makes students feel the joy of learning 18 (10.1) A class in which a professor stimulates students to think a lot and offers opportunities to think 14 (7.9) A class that leads students to change in their life, philosophy, and perception and discover meaningful value 10 (5.6) A class that allows students to learn new perspectives and solve problems by themselves 9 (5.1) A class that leads students to study by themselves and strives students to know and explore 4 (2.2) A class that enables students to anticipate their future as a nurse (Alhosis et al, 2015;Wolf et al, 2004). 상호작 용은 간호학뿐만 아니라 의학에서도 좋은 교수의 요건으로 제 시되고 있는데 (Azer, 2005;Wolf et al, 2004)…”
Section: (169)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…전문적 지식과 전략적 교수, 긍정적인 학습 분위기 조성, 전문 직 의식 등을 갖춘 수업 (Wolf, Bender, Beitz, Wieland, & Vito, 2004) (Jeong, 2012;Seo, 2004). 이 네 관 점은 모든 수업에서 필요로 되는 핵심으로 경우에 따라 가장 적절한 방법으로 수업에 적용하는 것이 요구된다 (Jeong, 2010) 고 하였지만, 학습자가 학습의 주체로서 자기주도적 학습과 경 험적 실천을 강조하는 학습자 중심의 교육으로 전환되어야 한 다는 주장도 있다 (Kang & Choo, 2009).…”
unclassified