1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf02594866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengths of solids under uniaxial compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies show that the dimensions of the end constraints can affect the failure morphology of the unconfirmed compression specimen ( 4 , 5 , 7 ). If the end constraint was large, the specimen was broken after the double cone shape; and if the face constraint was small, the specimen formed a number of top-down cracks.…”
Section: Failure Mechanism Of Unconfined Compression Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies show that the dimensions of the end constraints can affect the failure morphology of the unconfirmed compression specimen ( 4 , 5 , 7 ). If the end constraint was large, the specimen was broken after the double cone shape; and if the face constraint was small, the specimen formed a number of top-down cracks.…”
Section: Failure Mechanism Of Unconfined Compression Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1976, Beisetaev and Nikiforovskii simplified the cylinder into a two-dimensional plane, and studied it by the two-dimensional finite element method. The face constraint and Poisson’s ratio was found to have a great influence on the stress and strain distribution, but they did not explore the impact of the law in depth ( 5 ). At this point, the theoretical study of the unconfined compression test was also maintained in the two-dimensional plane solution stage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%