Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis of the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Primary Health Care in the Sub-Saharan African Region: Qualitative Study

Abstract

Background Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become increasingly commonplace as a means of delivering primary care. While DHTs have been postulated to reduce inequalities, increase access, and strengthen health systems, how the implementation of DHTs has been realized in the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) health care environment remains inadequately explored. Objective This study aims to capture the multidisciplinary experiences of primary care professionals using DHTs to explore the strengths and weaknesses, as well as opportunities and threats, regarding the implementation and use of DHTs in SSA primary care settings. Methods A combination of qualitative approaches was adopted (ie, focus groups and semistructured interviews). Participants were recruited through the African Forum for Primary Care and researchers’ contact networks using convenience sampling and included if having experience with digital technologies in primary health care in SSA. Focus and interviews were conducted, respectively, in November 2021 and January-March 2022. Topic guides were used to cover relevant topics in the interviews, using the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats framework. Transcripts were compiled verbatim and systematically reviewed by 2 independent reviewers using framework analysis to identify emerging themes. The COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist was used to ensure the study met the recommended standards of qualitative data reporting. Results A total of 33 participants participated in the study (n=13 and n=23 in the interviews and in focus groups, respectively; n=3 participants participated in both). The strengths of using DHTs ranged from improving access to care, supporting the continuity of care, and increasing care satisfaction and trust to greater collaboration, enabling safer decision-making, and hastening progress toward universal health coverage. Weaknesses included poor digital literacy, health inequalities, lack of human resources, inadequate training, lack of basic infrastructure and equipment, and poor coordination when implementing DHTs. DHTs were perceived as an opportunity to improve patient digital literacy, increase equity, promote more patient-centric design in upcoming DHTs, streamline expenditure, and provide a means to learn international best practices. Threats identified include the lack of buy-in from both patients and providers, insufficient human resources and local capacity, inadequate governmental support, overly restrictive regulations, and a lack of focus on cybersecurity and data protection. Conclusions The research highlights the complex challenges of implementing DHTs in the SSA context as a fast-moving health delivery modality, as well as the need for multistakeholder involvement. Future research should explore the nuances of these findings across different technologies and settings in the SSA region and implications on health and health care equity, capitalizing on mixed-methods research, including the use of real-world quantitative data to understand patient health needs. The promise of digital health will only be realized when informed by studies that incorporate patient perspective at every stage of the research cycle.

Building on the strengths of the mobile renewal system to increase health insurance uptake in Ghana: A qualitative study focusing on potential add-ons

“…According to the WHO, having governmental policies on data protection and security is essential for governing digital health initiatives, speci cally mobile health technology [26]. Our ndings highlight the importance of adhering to data protection and security recommendations, as reported in other studies [24,26,[37][38][39]. As we have found, positive experiences tend to boost users' con dence and willingness to adopt while negative experiences can create doubts and trust issues [39,40].…”

Proof of Concept of Telemedicine-Assisted Abdominal Ultrasound Examinations to Improve the Quality of Patient Care in Rural Areas

“…The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the use of telemedicine in Germany, while recent studies in developing countries, e.g., India and Africa have already shown that telemedical consultations improve patient access to the healthcare system [ 19 , 20 ]. Furthermore, healthcare providers and healthcare centers in rural areas benefit from telemedicine through reduced healthcare costs, easy access to better medical expertise, and better access to patients in rural areas.…”

“…Digital health techniques can reduce inequalities in access to health care and allow health care centers at different levels of care to co-operate for better and effective health care management of patients [ 20 , 27 ]. This study might help to clarify whether telemedicine-assisted ultrasound by a qualified expert is non-inferior to in-presence sonography (by a qualified expert) concerning clinical success.…”

“…Due to the use of a sonographic specialist in the telemedically assisted cohort (Group 1), there could be some bias regarding the interpretation and detection rate. When using digital health care techniques, health inequities, e.g., digital and health illiteracy are often mentioned as weaknesses at the patient level, while lack of training in digital health care techniques is often mentioned as a weakness from the health care provider’s perspective [ 20 ]. In our study, the weakness of digital illiteracy might be found, e.g., in wrong understanding of the questionnaires especially by older patients, who might not ask if they do not understand the questions correctly because they might feel ashamed.…”

Exploring the implementation of an SMS-based digital health tool on maternal and infant health in informal settlements

“…The high prevalence of mobile phones [ 7 ] in Low Middle Income Countries (LMICs) presents an opportunity to determine how to use this communication channel to advance MNCH. Many initiatives have attempted to leverage mobile phone reach for health, however, studies have shown that successful implementation of mHealth interventions in LMICs is often hampered by a number of issues: a lack of government buy-in and ownership, inadequate infrastructure and equipment, a lack of human resources and skills, inadequate legislation, an unstable or insufficient power supply, a lack of funding for sustainability, and weak evaluation mechanisms [ 8 , 9 ].…”