2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19A in Latin America and the Caribbean 2010–2015: A systematic review and a time series analysis

Abstract: This updated systematic review provides evidence of a reduction in the total number of invasive pneumococcal disease isolates after the introduction of PCVs in the region but cannot yet conclude a change in the trend of Spn19A disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 15 , 16 , 17 , 23 , 24 , 26 These data differ from those published in a recent systematic review that included data up to 2015. 18 In the present study, an upward trend was observed after 2008, and this trend increased between 2013 and 2017, showing an increase of 300%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 15 , 16 , 17 , 23 , 24 , 26 These data differ from those published in a recent systematic review that included data up to 2015. 18 In the present study, an upward trend was observed after 2008, and this trend increased between 2013 and 2017, showing an increase of 300%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…There are regional publications on the behavior of the serotype after vaccination with PCV10, including 19A. [15][16][17][18][19][20] However, there are no recent publications on the behavior of serotype 19A in Bogota after the massive use of PCV10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of PHiD-CV in the general population of Brazil are consistent with the findings from other countries including those in the Latin America and Caribbean region. [47][48][49][50] Findings from this review support the results of the original review that the PHiD-CV program in Brazil has a substantial direct and indirect positive impact on the IPD and noninvasive disease burden caused by vaccine-types, and furthermore evaluates the impact during the post-vaccination period after the change in vaccination scheme. 3 Among the vaccine target population, particularly < 5 year olds, vaccine-type IPD declined substantially post PHiD-CV introduction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, the prevalence of specific serotypes, such as 19A, has a relatively increasing trend, which is observed and sustains in most countries regardless of the vaccine used. 50 The increase in non-vaccine-type IPD after PHiD-CV introduction might be related to several factors such as antibiotic over-usage, pneumococcal carriage, the prevalence of IPD underlying illness or comorbidities, heterogeneity in vaccine coverage levels across a nation and the use of a passive laboratory-based surveillance system. 51 Non-vaccine types are now becoming an important cause of IPD regardless of differences in PCV programs (such as previous use of the 7-valent PCV, choice of higher valent PCV or immunization schedules), despite epidemiological differences (such as pre-PCV incidence or serotype distribution) and vaccination program (with catch-up scheme).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shown increases in 19A disease, which now represents a significant proportion of pneumococcal disease in both countries 60,61 and there have been several recent studies pointing to limited cross-protection from PCV10 against 19A. 62,63 Furthermore, recent real-world evidence has emerged from Belgium where 18 months following a change from PCV13 to PCV10 there was a 10 fold increase in cases of 19A in children 0-<2 years olds 47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%