“…The aim of this study was to compare the degradation effects of bacterial biofilm on the surface morphology and electrochemical behavior of four commercial dental implant surfaces: Ti‐SLA, Ti‐modSLA, TiZr‐SLA, and ZrO 2 ‐SLA. To simulate a worst‐case scenario for microbial‐induced corrosion and surface deterioration, implants were immersed continuously for 30 days in a polyculture consisting of three Streptococcus species implicated in peri‐implant diseases: S. mutans , S. sanguinis , and S. salivarius . Based on the literature, it was hypothesized that TiZr and ZrO 2 implants would exhibit a lower degree of bacterial colonization and surface degradation than pure Ti implants.…”