1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(97)00004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress analysis and strength prediction of mechanically fastened joints in FRP: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
121
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects such as bolt clamp up and secondary bending are best accounted for by 3D models, while the bearing mode of failure is a 3D phenomenon, involving through thickness cracks and delaminations [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects such as bolt clamp up and secondary bending are best accounted for by 3D models, while the bearing mode of failure is a 3D phenomenon, involving through thickness cracks and delaminations [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hole vicinities are the areas of high stress concentrations and they determine load capability of the whole structure. Therefore, mechanical joints of composite parts require a special focus during both a designing [2,3] and a manufacturing process [4]. The aim of the paper is analysis of potential local material weakness/deterioration caused by a drilling process and its influence on the global response of a mechanical joint.…”
Section: Object Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of FE-studies of bolted joints with composite plates exist in the literature [104]. They range from 2D models with rigid pins representing the bolt [78,105,106], to 3D solid models with or without damage development in the composite [47,52,72,76,80,103,[107][108][109][110][111] and they include parameters such as bolt pretension, bolt clearance, the effect of countersunk/protruding bolt heads, different failure initiation and damage progression models, by-pass loading, implicit/explicit solution methods etc.…”
Section: Modelling Of Quasi-static Failurementioning
confidence: 99%