1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90294-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress analysis of different osseointegrated implants supporting a distal extension prosthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 In addition, due to its low vertical profile, it effectively reduces the destructive lateral stress around the implant for lowering rotational center. 5,15 This is supported by Macros et al,…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…5 In addition, due to its low vertical profile, it effectively reduces the destructive lateral stress around the implant for lowering rotational center. 5,15 This is supported by Macros et al,…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…170174 However, clinical data indicated that this material did not serve successfully its purpose and required frequent replacement. 175,176 …”
Section: Biomechanics Of Tooth-implant-supported Fixed Partial Denturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a natural tooth with a healthy periodontal ligament has a mobility of 50 to 200 μm, an osseointegrated implant may move only 10 μm, which is primarily a result of bone flexibility 6,9,18 . To compensate for these differences, the use of non‐rigid connectors (NRCs), 4,12 or an implant with a stress‐absorbing element (intramobile element or stress‐breaking element), or an implant with a stress‐eliminating space have been recommended by some authors for TIFPs 4,7,10,19–23 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%