2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2024319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress analysis of encapsulated solar cells by means of superposition of thermal and mechanical stresses

Abstract: Within this contribution several 3D finite- element- models have been created in order to simulate processing of solar cells (lamination, soldering) as well as mechanical bending. The stress state for each load case was analysed with respect to magnitude and direction of principal stresses. For the process steps there are different mechanisms that induce stresses in the silicon. For soldering the mismatch in CTE is dominant. For lamination, bending around the ribbon is the dominant mechanism, which is due to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total UV dose for a 510‐hour exposure on the NIST SPHERE is equivalent to 5 to 6 years of field exposure when a 12% albedo for the reflected light on the backside of a PV module is assumed . Finite element analysis results show that the residual thermomechanical strain in the backsheet of a typical silicon PV module to be in the order of 0.1% . In the cell‐gap region, relatively large strain that is higher than the strain in the backsheet region can be produced when temperature changes .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total UV dose for a 510‐hour exposure on the NIST SPHERE is equivalent to 5 to 6 years of field exposure when a 12% albedo for the reflected light on the backside of a PV module is assumed . Finite element analysis results show that the residual thermomechanical strain in the backsheet of a typical silicon PV module to be in the order of 0.1% . In the cell‐gap region, relatively large strain that is higher than the strain in the backsheet region can be produced when temperature changes .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,10 Finite element analysis results show that the residual thermomechanical strain in the backsheet of a typical silicon PV module to be in the order of 0.1%. 45,46 In the cell-gap region, relatively large strain that is higher than the strain in the backsheet region can be produced when temperature changes. 47 Critical surface cracking strain is measured to be 0.14% to 0.31% (c.f.…”
Section: Analysis and Comparison With Outdoor Field Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical stress and strain in modules was examined using finite-element analysis in Refs. [38], [39], [40]. Table I summarizes key differences identified between the mechanical state invoked in the CST method and that common to PV modules.…”
Section: Stress and Strain In Pv Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimen curvature tends to be minimal for glass/encapsulant/glass CST specimens, where curvature provides relatively little influence on the test [7]. Specimen curvature instead varies with thermal misfit and residual stress in a glass/encapsulant/backsheet PV module, which are major sources of stress variation through module lifetime [40]. The dominant stress in CST is an applied shear, as dictated by the test geometry.…”
Section: Stress and Strain In Pv Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a glass-backsheet structure, an encapsulant and backsheet are attached outside the glass, and they have relatively small influences on the total module strength due to the high mismatch in moduli of the materials. On the other hand, in the double-glass structure, an encapsulant located in the middle of a module plays a much more critical role in transmitting shear stress from the upper glass to the lower glass when a specific load is applied to the module [1]- [4]. Thus, the stiffness of an encapsulant plays a determining role of module stiffness and associated load resistance (strength) in the double-glass structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%