Lubrication of gearbox has been studied by many investigators using experimental, analytical, and numerical methods. Changenet and Velex (2006) derived a series of formulae that can accurately predict the churning losses for one pinion characteristic of automotive transmission geometry based on experimental analysis over a wide range of speeds, gear geometries, lubrications, and immersion depths. Laruelle et al. (2017) provided a wide variety of experimental tests on churning losses to find out the impact of speed, lubricant, temperature, and gear geometry on splash lubrication power losses. An extended equation was then developed from the experimental results to estimate churning losses of bevel gears. Leprince et al. (2012) set up a test rig to measure the quantity of lubricant splashed at different locations on the casing walls and deduced a set of formulae based on the experimental results to predict the lubricant flow rate generated by one spur gear at various places on the casing. Chen and Matsumoto (2016) performed oil churning loss experiments to clarify the influence of the relative position of gears and casing wall shape of gearbox under splash lubrication condition. They concluded that in addition to the well-known factors, relative position, casing wall shape, and the steady-state oil surface also had significant effects on the churning loss. Liu et al. (2012) suggested a new lubricant and measured the transmission efficiency, bulk temperature, and gear tooth scuffing at four different immersion depths. A range of reasonable immersion depths was obtained from that research. Neurouth et al. (2017) also followed an experimental approach to decide if splash lubrication technique is worth considering for high-speed gears (i.e. for tangential gear speed up to 60 m/s). The researchers used a specific test rig to operate a single spur or helical gear in various operation