2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b11333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress and Magnetic Field Bimode Detection Sensors Based on Flexible CI/CNTs–PDMS Sponges

Abstract: This work reports porous carbonyl iron particles/multiwalled carbon nanotubes-polydimethylsiloxane composites (PCMCs) with high flexibility and low density. In comparison to the solid product, the porous PCMC possesses a larger elongation and deformation. Because of the excellent magnetic-mechanic-electric coupling performance, the flexible composite exhibits bimode sensitivity to both the external stresses and magnetic field. Typically, the normalized resistance variation (Δ R/ R) of PCMC reaches 82.8% and 52… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, breaking and rebuilding electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds within these materials dissipated induced strain [30]. The most used stretchable polymeric materials for e-skin substrate were: Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) [31][32][33][34], other silicone rubber films [35,36], polyurethane (PU) [37][38][39], polyimide (PI) [40,41], polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [42,43], silk fabric-derived carbon textile [44], parylene [45][46][47], and even paper [48].…”
Section: Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, breaking and rebuilding electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds within these materials dissipated induced strain [30]. The most used stretchable polymeric materials for e-skin substrate were: Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) [31][32][33][34], other silicone rubber films [35,36], polyurethane (PU) [37][38][39], polyimide (PI) [40,41], polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [42,43], silk fabric-derived carbon textile [44], parylene [45][46][47], and even paper [48].…”
Section: Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Printed magnetic field sensors have been underrepresented, mainly due to the complexity to obtain printable, well-conductive magnetosensitive composites with stable resistance readout [9,15]. The introduction of magnetic particles into elastomer matrices is one approach to obtain magnetoresponsive compounds [16][17][18][19][20]. Magnetic nanoparticles embedded in conductive agglomerates can be concatenated using an external magnetic field during the curing process of the binder (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] However, most sensors with 3D microporous conductive network can only tune the channel resistance, while shaping microstructures on rough surface only adjusts the contact resistance. [22][23][24][25] In addition, most microstructures are usually coated with uniform and small size conductive materials, which mainly modulate conduction under loading process, resulting in significant contact resistance and limited sensitivity. [26][27][28][29] Also, the microstructures are always fabricated by complicated, costly and time-consuming lithography processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other decisive factor, the conductive active materials, should sensitively reflect corresponding current feedback on pressure loading. Different materials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), [22,23,30] graphene, [20,24,31] polymers, [21,32] and nanoparticles [33] have been widely explored. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), as a widely used sponge with a large porous structure interacts poorly with small microstructures such as 1D nanowires or nanoparticles, influencing the stability of the pressure sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation