1999
DOI: 10.1075/dia.16.1.03dua
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress and the Development of Disyllabic Words in Chinese

Abstract: SUMMARYA common conception of Chinese is that most of its words are monosyllabic historically but disyllabic in modern times. Since Chinese lost over 50% of its syllables in the past 1000 years, a standard explanation for the increase of disyllabic words is that they are created to avoid homonyms. I argue instead that, although disyllabic words have increased recently, Chinese has always had many disyllabic words. In addition, the increase of disyllabic words is not primarily due to homonym avoidance, but due … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, trochaic systems never seem to undergo monosyllabization. This is true not only of the numerous trochaic languages with a combination of disyllabic roots and a complex affixation system (for example, the majority of Central and Eastern Malayo-Polynesian languages), but also seems to be true of disyllabic trochaic languages with little or no affixation, like the languages of Flores (Djawanai & Grimes 1995, Verheijen & Grimes 1995, Baird 2002 or Mandarin Chinese (Duanmu 1999). This is puzzling: at first glance, if a disyllabic iamb can lose its initial unstressed syllable, a disyllabic trochee could also drop its final unstressed syllable.…”
Section: Maleng Brômentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, trochaic systems never seem to undergo monosyllabization. This is true not only of the numerous trochaic languages with a combination of disyllabic roots and a complex affixation system (for example, the majority of Central and Eastern Malayo-Polynesian languages), but also seems to be true of disyllabic trochaic languages with little or no affixation, like the languages of Flores (Djawanai & Grimes 1995, Verheijen & Grimes 1995, Baird 2002 or Mandarin Chinese (Duanmu 1999). This is puzzling: at first glance, if a disyllabic iamb can lose its initial unstressed syllable, a disyllabic trochee could also drop its final unstressed syllable.…”
Section: Maleng Brômentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, gú "bone" does not occur alone but in combination with tóu "head" (Norman 1988, Duanmu 1999. At an early stage, such compounds probably did not have a clear stress pattern but showed roughly equal stress in the two syllables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From the viewpoint of the Buddhist and Taoist scriptures of Eastern Han Dynasty, the polysyllablization of Chinese vocabulary based on the new lexical items is discussed in [16]. Since most of polysyllabic words are disyllabic words, the development of disyllabic words in Chinese is discussed in [17]. Also, many quantitative surveys and analyses have been conducted on polysyllabic words in different monographs across different time periods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We presume that truncation in these cases is dictated by a phonological preference for disyllabic words (e.g., Duanmu 1999). The majority of Chinese words are disyllabic, and there are both truncation processes and augmentation processes that conspire to produce them (Duanmu 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%