2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24965-5_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress Classification for Gender Bias in Reading

Abstract: The paper investigates classification of stress in reading for males and females based on an artificial neural network model (ANN). An experiment was conducted, with stressful and non-stressful reading material as stimuli, to obtain galvanic skin response (GSR) signals, a good indicator of stress. GSR signals formed the input of the ANN with stressed and non-stressed states as the two output classes. Results show that stress in reading for males compared to females are significantly different (p < 0.01), with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, only a few studies have proposed a stress detection based only on EDA, showing methodological limitations that reduce the application to real-life scenarios. In fact, despite satisfactory accuracies, they have often shown limitations in the EDA decomposition method, which affect the reliability of the estimated sympathetic response [47], [48], [50], [51]. More specifically, they have applied trough-to-peak algorithms (i.e., without decompose into tonic and phasic components) [48], [50] or filtering approaches [47], [51], achieving an average accuracy between 74.19% and 85.5% in binary classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, only a few studies have proposed a stress detection based only on EDA, showing methodological limitations that reduce the application to real-life scenarios. In fact, despite satisfactory accuracies, they have often shown limitations in the EDA decomposition method, which affect the reliability of the estimated sympathetic response [47], [48], [50], [51]. More specifically, they have applied trough-to-peak algorithms (i.e., without decompose into tonic and phasic components) [48], [50] or filtering approaches [47], [51], achieving an average accuracy between 74.19% and 85.5% in binary classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, despite satisfactory accuracies, they have often shown limitations in the EDA decomposition method, which affect the reliability of the estimated sympathetic response [47], [48], [50], [51]. More specifically, they have applied trough-to-peak algorithms (i.e., without decompose into tonic and phasic components) [48], [50] or filtering approaches [47], [51], achieving an average accuracy between 74.19% and 85.5% in binary classification. These two methods have been extensively demonstrated to underestimate the sympathetic response in the frequent case of overlapped skin conductance phasic responses compared to a model-based approach (e.g., cvxEDA) [52], [54], [55], [66] (and others).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various computational techniques have been used to objectively recognize stress using models based on techniques such as Bayesian networks [11], decision trees [12], support vector machines [13], and artificial neural networks [14]. These techniques have used a range of physiological (e.g., heart activity [15,16], brain activity [17,18], galvanic skin response [19], and skin temperature [12,20]) and physical (e.g., eye gaze [11], facial information [21]) measures for stress as inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can recognize differences in behaviour in reading by gender [62], and differentiate English as a first language readers from second or later language readers [61]. We can differentiate responses to face replacement in videos [63].…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%