2019
DOI: 10.1080/14484846.2019.1565069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress concentration factor analysis of countersunk holes using finite element analysis and response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R 2 ), and sufficient precision values. The model’s accuracy was demonstrated by the higher R 2 value of 0.9992 . The correlation between the predicted and measured values or the Adj.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…R 2 ), and sufficient precision values. The model’s accuracy was demonstrated by the higher R 2 value of 0.9992 . The correlation between the predicted and measured values or the Adj.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The model’s accuracy was demonstrated by the higher R 2 value of 0.9992. 34 The correlation between the predicted and measured values or the Adj. R 2 is used to represent how well the regression model fits the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also provided empirical formulations to calculate SCF in countersunk holes with different geometric properties. Later, Darwish et al [22,23] and Gharaibeh et al [24] proved that the error in the equations provided by Bhargava et al [24] is considerably high for thick countersunk hole with large radii and countersink depths. As a result, they provided modified and more accurate equations to compute SCF in countersunk holes subjected to uniaxial tension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their simulation results showed that the stress concentration is commonly located at the sinking edge of the hole and they further used the numerical data to formulate an empirical formulas to mathematically compute t K in countersunk holes based on the geometry of the hole. Later, Gharaibeh et al [15] and Darwish et al [16,17] provided improved formulas for the SCF in countersunk holes in isotropic and orthotropic plates subjected to uniaxial tensile loadings. Hayajneh et al [18] and Bhargava et al [19] investigated the strain concentration factor (SeCF) in countersunk holes under uniaxial tension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%