1964
DOI: 10.5006/0010-9312-20.3.93t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress Corrosion Cracking Study of Several High Strength Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other tests showed that there were no effects of fall times or hold times at minimum load if the preceding rise time was longer than ~80 s or preceding hold time at maximum load was longer than ~80 s. Discussion. In discussing the differences in crack growth rates for the different waveforms, one needs to bear in mind that (i) the maximum K value is well below the sustained-load SCC threshold K value [14], (ii) there was no effect when rise times were long, and (iii) the comparisons have been made for the same rise time and cycle period such that crack growth promoted by electrochemical reactions/adsorbed hydrogen at the external crack tip during the rise time will be fairly similar, and the time available for hydrogen accumulation in nanovoids ahead of cracks is the same. Thus, some of the differences in the da/dN versus cycle-period plots for the different waveforms probably lie in differences in rates of hydrogen accumulation in nanovoids owing to different stress fields, but another difference between the K max -hold waveform and the others is that it is likely that some crack growth occurs during the K max hold time.…”
Section: Corrosion-fatigue Crack-growth Rates In Steels: Effects Of H...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other tests showed that there were no effects of fall times or hold times at minimum load if the preceding rise time was longer than ~80 s or preceding hold time at maximum load was longer than ~80 s. Discussion. In discussing the differences in crack growth rates for the different waveforms, one needs to bear in mind that (i) the maximum K value is well below the sustained-load SCC threshold K value [14], (ii) there was no effect when rise times were long, and (iii) the comparisons have been made for the same rise time and cycle period such that crack growth promoted by electrochemical reactions/adsorbed hydrogen at the external crack tip during the rise time will be fairly similar, and the time available for hydrogen accumulation in nanovoids ahead of cracks is the same. Thus, some of the differences in the da/dN versus cycle-period plots for the different waveforms probably lie in differences in rates of hydrogen accumulation in nanovoids owing to different stress fields, but another difference between the K max -hold waveform and the others is that it is likely that some crack growth occurs during the K max hold time.…”
Section: Corrosion-fatigue Crack-growth Rates In Steels: Effects Of H...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that the crack path can be changed in a controlled manner by variations in tempering temperature (Davis et al, 1964;Truman et (From Bern stein, 1970. Specifically, it is imperative that the operating crack path be com patible with the steel's microstructure .…”
Section: Thermal and Thermomechanical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it is imperative that the operating crack path be com patible with the steel's microstructure . For ex ample, in a variety of steels, an increasing tempering temperature changes the hydrogen-induced crack path from transgranular to inter granular (Davis et al, 1964;Truman et al, 1964;Lillys and Nehrenberg, 1956). ) al, 1964; Lillys and Nehrenberg, 1956), postanneal cooling rate (Bern stein, 1970;Marquez et al, 1970), and the addition of certain solutes (Rath and Bernstein, 1971;Pressouyre and Bernstein, 1974).…”
Section: Thermal and Thermomechanical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9] It has been reported that the susceptibility to EAC is greater at higher yield strengths. [1,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Generally, highly acidic conditions promote cracking and highly basic conditions reduce or even prevent cracking. However, over a certain range of pH, there is no great change in susceptibility to EAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%