2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress-elicited neural activity in young adults varies with childhood sexual abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent to which these rodent behavioral changes reflect those observed in victims of early sexual abuse in humans remains unknown, but it may be relevant that childhood sexual abuse has been associated with reduced cognitive function ( Navalta et al, 2006 ) as well as impaired parenting skills ( Burkett, 1991 ; Cole et al, 1992 ; Ethier et al, 1995 ). Very limited evidence exists regarding the effects of this paradigm on the rodent brain, but available data suggest a reduction in neuronal growth in the hippocampus ( Shors et al, 2016 ), which is consistent with work in humans showing that hippocampal volume and activation are reduced after childhood sexual abuse ( Weniger et al, 2008 ; Yuan et al, 2020 ; Purcell et al, 2021 ; compare Table 2 with Table 1 ). Clearly, this approach presents an innovative experimental animal paradigm that should be explored further for potential translational relevance.…”
Section: Sexual Aggressionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extent to which these rodent behavioral changes reflect those observed in victims of early sexual abuse in humans remains unknown, but it may be relevant that childhood sexual abuse has been associated with reduced cognitive function ( Navalta et al, 2006 ) as well as impaired parenting skills ( Burkett, 1991 ; Cole et al, 1992 ; Ethier et al, 1995 ). Very limited evidence exists regarding the effects of this paradigm on the rodent brain, but available data suggest a reduction in neuronal growth in the hippocampus ( Shors et al, 2016 ), which is consistent with work in humans showing that hippocampal volume and activation are reduced after childhood sexual abuse ( Weniger et al, 2008 ; Yuan et al, 2020 ; Purcell et al, 2021 ; compare Table 2 with Table 1 ). Clearly, this approach presents an innovative experimental animal paradigm that should be explored further for potential translational relevance.…”
Section: Sexual Aggressionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Childhood sexual and physical abuse have been linked to reduced volume of the amygdala regardless of clinical diagnosis ( Nogovitsyn et al, 2020 ) suggesting that early exposure to trauma alters the structural development of this region, perhaps contributing to vulnerability to subsequent stress. Childhood sexual, but not physical, abuse has been associated with diminished stress-induced activation of the dorsolateral frontal cortex and hippocampus ( Purcell et al, 2021 ). Childhood sexual abuse produces thinning of the visual cortex and somatosensory cortex associated with genital representations in a way that may not be related to the development of psychopathology as the effects can be observed even in individuals without diagnoses ( Tomoda et al, 2009 ; Heim et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Sexual Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, changes in hippocampal structure may partially underlie the disruptions in memory function that are associated with alcohol use. The hippocampus also plays an important role in emotion expression and regulation (Ghasemi et al, 2022; Hartley & Phelps, 2010; Purcell et al, 2021; Snyder et al, 2011). For example, the hippocampus supports the extinction of conditioned fear, and alterations in hippocampal function have been linked to anxiety-related conditions (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder, panic disorders; Ghasemi et al, 2022; Hartley & Phelps, 2010; Knight et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior neuroimaging findings revealed that MDD patients exhibited altered neural stress response in limbic‐striatal‐prefrontal regions (Admon et al, 2015; Holsen et al, 2011; Ming et al, 2017). Moreover, neuroimaging studies in healthy individuals reported that CM is associated with increased stress‐induced activation in the amygdala (Grimm et al, 2014; Seo et al, 2019), hippocampus (Grimm et al, 2014; Seo et al, 2019), anterior cingulate cortex (Grimm et al, 2014), dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC; van Harmelen et al, 2014), cerebellum (Seo et al, 2019), medial temporal lobe (Seo et al, 2019), insula (Zhong et al, 2020), precuneus (Zhong et al, 2020), and decreased stress‐induced activation in the ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Purcell et al, 2021), as well as increased stress‐induced amygdala‐hippocampus connectivity (Fan et al, 2015). Although these findings are not always consistent, they suggest that CM may impact neural stress responses in neural circuitries partly overlapping with regions consistently implicated in MDD (e.g., amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, neuroimaging studies in healthy individuals reported that CM is associated with increased stress-induced activation in the amygdala (Grimm et al, 2014;Seo et al, 2019), hippocampus (Grimm et al, 2014;Seo et al, 2019), anterior cingulate cortex (Grimm et al, 2014), dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC; van Harmelen et al, 2014), cerebellum (Seo et al, 2019), medial temporal lobe (Seo et al, 2019), insula (Zhong et al, 2020), precuneus (Zhong et al, 2020), and decreased stress-induced activation in the ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Purcell et al, 2021), as well as increased stress-induced amygdala-hippocampus connectivity (Fan et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%