2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00445-021-01471-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress fields around magma chambers influenced by elastic thermo-mechanical deformation: implications for forecasting chamber failure

Abstract: Main points:• Comparison of crustal stresses induced from mechanical and thermomechanical loading around a magma chamber• Thermal expansion acts to increase the level of shear stress but suppresses the level of tensile stress around pressurized magma chambers• Elastic deformation resulting from thermal expansion of rocks surrounding magma chambers should be considered in failure forecasting models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A steady‐state temperature field, composed of a background geothermal gradient and the thermal perturbation owing to the modeled reservoir, is used to determine the viscosity distribution within the crust. This study specifically isolates the temporal stress response due to the non‐uniform crustal viscosity, and so does not include thermo‐elastic effects, such as thermal expansion of the surrounding rock (e.g., Browning et al., 2021) or temperature‐dependence of the elastic parameters (e.g., Bakker et al., 2016; Gregg et al., 2012).…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A steady‐state temperature field, composed of a background geothermal gradient and the thermal perturbation owing to the modeled reservoir, is used to determine the viscosity distribution within the crust. This study specifically isolates the temporal stress response due to the non‐uniform crustal viscosity, and so does not include thermo‐elastic effects, such as thermal expansion of the surrounding rock (e.g., Browning et al., 2021) or temperature‐dependence of the elastic parameters (e.g., Bakker et al., 2016; Gregg et al., 2012).…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first textbooks that explicitly define the discipline of volcanotectonics were published only in the past decade (Gudmundsson 2011(Gudmundsson , 2020Acocella 2021). This is a testament to the discipline's novelty.…”
Section: Recent Events That Have Shaped Volcanotectonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to well-known and long-studied earthquake swarms and deformation signals, some volcanoes provide thermal signals that may appear years or decades before eruptions (Girona et al 2021). These signals need to be linked with thermo-mechanical deformation processes that lead to seismogenic rock failure (Browning et al 2021). The potential effects of earthquakes, particularly large ones, on nearby volcanoes need to be further explored (Manga and Brodsky 2006;Namiki et al 2016;Seropian et al 2021).…”
Section: Volcanotectonics In 2030mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume 'pure' 𝞓P and 𝞓V endmembers to focus on first-order differences, whereas there is likely mixed-mode deformation and dynamical relationships between the two (Gregg et al, 2013). Similar FEA model formulations to those employed here have been widely applied in volcano geodetic modelling (Grosfils, 2007;Currenti et al, 2008;Del Negro et al, 2009;Geyer and Gottsmann, 2010;Hautmann et al, 2010;Gregg et al, 2012Gregg et al, , 2013Hickey et al, 2013;Pascal et al, 2013;Currenti and Williams, 2014;Gottsmann and Odbert, 2014;Hickey and Gottsmann, 2014;Gregg et al, 2015;Hickey et al, 2015Hickey et al, , 2016Gottsmann et al, 2017;Gregg et al, 2018;Head et al, 2019;Morales Rivera et al, 2019;Cabaniss et al, 2020;Gottsmann et al, 2020;Hickey et al, 2020;Browning et al, 2021;Head et al, 2021;Taylor et al, 2021;Zhan et al, 2022). Other modelling methods couple solid and fluid mechanics in poroelastic (Liao et al, 2018) or poroviscoelastic setups (Liao et al, 2021), but there are currently insufficient observations (e.g., hydraulic properties of the magmatic reservoir/mush) to be able to robustly parameterise such a model at SHV.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%