2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2019.125955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress generation during anisotropic lithiation in silicon nanopillar electrodes: A reactive force field study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanostructures have been studied also by Fan et al 13 , who computed the mechanical response of (111)-oriented c-Si nanopillar during lithiation. Similar work has been carried out for the (100)-oriented c-Si nanopillar by Cao et al 14 . Tang et al 15 investigated the evolution and survivability of porosity in Si nanosheets during the lithiation and delithiation processes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Nanostructures have been studied also by Fan et al 13 , who computed the mechanical response of (111)-oriented c-Si nanopillar during lithiation. Similar work has been carried out for the (100)-oriented c-Si nanopillar by Cao et al 14 . Tang et al 15 investigated the evolution and survivability of porosity in Si nanosheets during the lithiation and delithiation processes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Consequently, they failed to capture the microstructural changes and stress generated in a-Si and c-Si during lithiation. Two recent atomistic simulations obtained the isotropic and anisotropic volume expansions of SiNPs with a diameter of 10.0 nm, , but the generated stresses were different from previous theoretical predictions. ,, Moreover, the atomistic mechanisms giving rise to plastic flow of Li x Si alloys and lithiation-induced fracture have not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Therefore, it can be concluded that the CG and FIRE methods are more efficient for fine energy minimization, while the NVE dynamic relaxation is better for coarse energy minimization with a significant energy change. Note that the lithiated SiNPs in previous MD works were only relaxed by the CG method, , possibly leading to the inconsistent stress distribution compared with theoretical predictions …”
Section: New Structural Relaxation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well recognized that the stresses generated in the silicon-based materials regulate the kinetics of chemical reactions and potential response [25,49]. The mechanism by which the tensile/compressive stress facilitates/retards the diffusion of Li atoms may cause the inhomogeneous growth of the lithiated phase, leading to the nonuniform distribution of morphology and Li ion concentration [17,45,[50][51][52][53]. To further study this, the stress evolution is quantitively investigated.…”
Section: Stress-regulated Effects During Lithiationmentioning
confidence: 99%