“…These methods might offer substantial advantages over existing techniques, because only small volumes of haemolymph are required (e.g., ~25-300 µL per test) and the small-gauge needles used are minimally intrusive (e.g., 26G needle, 0.45 mm Ø). Repetitive sampling over time is unlikely to be lastingly injurious or lethal to specimens (Hamann, 1975;Paterson et al, 1997), although the possibility for adverse side effects (i.e., infection) cannot be absolutely excluded. Furthermore, as haemolymph constitutes ~30% of a crayfishes biomass (marine species, see Belman, 1975) and total volume can be quickly adjusted through biological functions (Greco et al, 1986), these methods are suitable for use on rare and endangered species.…”