2012
DOI: 10.1089/wound.2011.0320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress-Induced Hormones Cortisol and Epinephrine Impair Wound Epithelization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using three immunologically diverse mouse models of inflammatory disease, irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), acute allergic contact dermatitis, and repeated hapten challenge in a model of chronic allergic contact dermatitis with features of AD, the investigators found that imposition of exogenous stress exerts potent antiinflammatory activity (reductions in IL-1a and IL-6), thus improving both barrier function and stratum corneum hydration, all of which is mediated by a rise in endogenous GCs (Figure 1b). This systemic GC protective effect, in contrast to the existing literature, suggests that the stress effects of increased endogenous GCs compromise permeability barrier homeostasis, stratum corneum adhesion, wound healing, and epidermal innate immunity in normal skin (Stojadinovic et al, 2012). Possibly, the differences in results lie in responses that originate from normal as opposed to inflamed skin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Using three immunologically diverse mouse models of inflammatory disease, irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), acute allergic contact dermatitis, and repeated hapten challenge in a model of chronic allergic contact dermatitis with features of AD, the investigators found that imposition of exogenous stress exerts potent antiinflammatory activity (reductions in IL-1a and IL-6), thus improving both barrier function and stratum corneum hydration, all of which is mediated by a rise in endogenous GCs (Figure 1b). This systemic GC protective effect, in contrast to the existing literature, suggests that the stress effects of increased endogenous GCs compromise permeability barrier homeostasis, stratum corneum adhesion, wound healing, and epidermal innate immunity in normal skin (Stojadinovic et al, 2012). Possibly, the differences in results lie in responses that originate from normal as opposed to inflamed skin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, these cells are hyperproliferative and mitotically active at the edge of chronic wounds. But they fail to migrate and create a hyperkeratotic tissue at the edge of the wound (Stojadinovic et al, 2012;Martin and Nunan, 2015).…”
Section: Keratinocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiologic stress response involves two pathways—the hypothalamic–pituitary adrenal axis, which releases glucocorticoids, such as cortisol, and the sympatho‐adrenomedullary axis, which releases catecholamines . As an example, glucocorticoids and catecholamines bind to their respective keratinocyte receptors and inhibit epithelialization . Likewise, antagonizing these receptors speeds healing; for example, patients suffering from burn wounds taking the beta‐adrenergic antagonist, propranolol had shorter healing times of their burn wounds and a shorter time‐to‐skin‐graft healing …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%