2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress-induced structural changes in plant chromatin

Abstract: Stress defense in plants is elaborated at the level of protection and adaptation. Dynamic changes in sophisticated chromatin substructures and concomitant transcriptional changes play an important role in response to stress, as illustrated by the transient rearrangement of compact heterochromatin structures or the modulation of chromatin composition and modification upon stress exposure. To connect cytological, developmental, and molecular data around stress and chromatin is currently an interesting, multiface… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
2
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While chromatin states are a critical part of transcriptional responses during development (reviewed in He et al, 2011;Holec and Berger, 2012;Grimanelli and Roudier, 2013;Pikaard and Mittelsten Scheid, 2014;Xiao and Wagner, 2015) or in response to the environment (reviewed in Baulcombe and Dean, 2014;Bond and Baulcombe, 2014;Pikaard and Mittelsten Scheid, 2014;Probst and Mittelsten Scheid, 2015;Vriet et al, 2015), they also play critical roles in creating order in the genome, allowing for the maintenance of proper transcription and genome stability in the face of varying TE landscapes and polyploid changes. We suggest that diverse plant species have evolved variations in the specific mechanisms of chromatin regulation that have allowed them to survive the repeated transposon bursts or polyploidy fusions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While chromatin states are a critical part of transcriptional responses during development (reviewed in He et al, 2011;Holec and Berger, 2012;Grimanelli and Roudier, 2013;Pikaard and Mittelsten Scheid, 2014;Xiao and Wagner, 2015) or in response to the environment (reviewed in Baulcombe and Dean, 2014;Bond and Baulcombe, 2014;Pikaard and Mittelsten Scheid, 2014;Probst and Mittelsten Scheid, 2015;Vriet et al, 2015), they also play critical roles in creating order in the genome, allowing for the maintenance of proper transcription and genome stability in the face of varying TE landscapes and polyploid changes. We suggest that diverse plant species have evolved variations in the specific mechanisms of chromatin regulation that have allowed them to survive the repeated transposon bursts or polyploidy fusions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, chromatin modifiers are likely to be recruited to achieve and stabilize alterations in transcription. Several recent reviews have provided excellent summaries of these activities and point toward the conservation of these pathways among flowering plants (Baulcombe and Dean, 2014;Bond and Baulcombe, 2014;Pikaard and Mittelsten Scheid, 2014;Probst and Mittelsten Scheid, 2015;Vriet et al, 2015;Xiao and Wagner, 2015). In this Review, we focus on aspects of chromatin regulation that might be variable or drive variation among closely related species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thousands of genes are involved in the response; therefore, global genome regulation at the chromatin level is required to achieve the appropriate level of responsiveness (Y. Probst and Mittelsten Scheid, 2015). This may be achieved by nucleosome remodeling and repositioning via covalent modifications of histone proteins, especially trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (van Dijk et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2008) and redistribution of histone variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, repeated exposure to stress can lead to plant stress priming, whereby prior stress exposure conveys an enhanced ability to respond to future events (Conrath et al, 2006;Ding et al, 2012;Gordon et al, 2013;Sani et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2014;Virlouvet and Fromm, 2015;Hilker et al, 2016;Wibowo et al, 2016). This notion has been extended to numerous considerations of the formation of plant stress memory, in which a state of altered stress responsivity is mitotically or meiotically transmissible (Bruce et al, 2007;Hauser et al, 2011b;Probst and Mittelsten Scheid, 2015;Crisp et al, 2016;van Loon, 2016). There is much interest in plant stress memory, including the underlying molecular mechanism(s) and its potential to impact crop yields, particularly in harsh and variable environments (Springer, 2013;Ji et al, 2015;Mickelbart et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%