1989
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(89)90246-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress intensity factor equations for part-elliptical cracks and their verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for a semi-elliptical surface crack, the singularity of the stress ÿeld at the intersection point of the crack front with the surface of the body is not r −1=2 [27,28]. The value of K [26] in the MWF method were used, the errors on the value of K at all locations on the crack front. However, in the present method, the e ect would be limited to a small region near that location.…”
Section: Multiple Virtual Crack Extension Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, for a semi-elliptical surface crack, the singularity of the stress ÿeld at the intersection point of the crack front with the surface of the body is not r −1=2 [27,28]. The value of K [26] in the MWF method were used, the errors on the value of K at all locations on the crack front. However, in the present method, the e ect would be limited to a small region near that location.…”
Section: Multiple Virtual Crack Extension Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Vainshtok and Varfolomeyev [26] work, an elliptical type of crack geometry was studied. Five kinds of 'crack front translations', two for elliptical expansions along its principal axes and two for rigid translations along these axes and one for rigid rotation about its centre, were used to deÿne the VCEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such evaluation of K~-data in three-dimensional crack problems may become insufficient, as it was demonstrated for some part-through crack configurations [1]. Another way to check the quality of K~-results [2,3] is based on the evaluation of average, or integral, errors through the calculation of energy integrals associated with a cracked body.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified integration p a t h for evaluating the energy relation if the stress intensity factor solution is not available d o w n to a/c = O. Quality factors R41 defined by (21) for several solutions: (a) interpolation ofTable 3by cubic splines and by use of the fitting formula (9); (b) formula of Newman and Raj u [2] and formula of Vainshtok and Varfolomeyev[5], based on the Newman/Raju results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%