2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress interference and interaction between two fractures during their propagation: insights from SCDA test and XFEM simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They considered two fracturing construction schemes: sequential and synchronous fracturing. By comparing the analytical solutions with the numerical experimental results, it demonstrated a strong agreement between the two methods (Wang et al, 2023a). Tang et al addressed the issue of mesh distortion in their work based on DDM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…They considered two fracturing construction schemes: sequential and synchronous fracturing. By comparing the analytical solutions with the numerical experimental results, it demonstrated a strong agreement between the two methods (Wang et al, 2023a). Tang et al addressed the issue of mesh distortion in their work based on DDM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The latter has the advantage of avoiding the decrease in computational convergence caused by mesh refinement due to stress concentration and the ability to simulate fracture propagation direction changes. However, its computational efficiency is not high, and it cannot form intersecting fractures [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress shadow area is determined based on the minimum size of the fractured surface. Consequently, the effect of stress shadow is dominated by the hydraulic fracture height [63,64]. As shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%