2018
DOI: 10.1117/1.oe.57.4.046112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress reaction process-based hierarchical recognition algorithm for continuous intrusion events in optical fiber prewarning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With reference to the above experimental setup, according to this method, the characteristic of fiber vibration signal was extracted, obtaining the characteristics of intrusion signals such as shaking protection nets, knocking protection nets, and over-protection fences, and obtaining their respective feature sets after condensing. The method of reference from [4], the method of reference from [5], and the proposed method were used to identify and identify the intrusion signals. The recognition results were obtained by identifying and comparing the features.…”
Section: Comparison Of Intrusion Signal Recognition Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…With reference to the above experimental setup, according to this method, the characteristic of fiber vibration signal was extracted, obtaining the characteristics of intrusion signals such as shaking protection nets, knocking protection nets, and over-protection fences, and obtaining their respective feature sets after condensing. The method of reference from [4], the method of reference from [5], and the proposed method were used to identify and identify the intrusion signals. The recognition results were obtained by identifying and comparing the features.…”
Section: Comparison Of Intrusion Signal Recognition Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dividing the correct recognition of each category by the number of test signals and calculating the accuracy of their identification, we received the results shown in Table 1. According to the data in Table 1, the average recognition accuracy rate of intrusion signal of reference [4] method is 79.9%, that of reference [5] method is 76.6%, and that of the proposed method is as high as 94.4%. It can be seen that the recognition accuracy of intrusion signals such as the shaking protection net, striking protection net, and crossing the protection fence of the proposed method are higher than those of the reference [4] method and the reference [5] method.…”
Section: Comparison Of Intrusion Signal Recognition Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations