2021
DOI: 10.1177/1464420721992445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress–strain evaluation of structural parts using artificial neural networks

Abstract: The last decades have been driven by significant progress in the computational capacity, which have been supporting the development of increasingly realistic and detailed simulations. However, despite these improvements, several problems still do not have an effective solution, due to their numerical complexity. As a result, the answer to these problems can be improved by using techniques that enable the description of phenomena with less resolution, but with lower computational costs, which is the case of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These machine learning approaches facilitate the development of data-driven surrogate models capable of approximating the mapping between input parameters and structural responses. The surrogates can significantly expedite the iterative optimization process inherent in model updating by replacing computationally expensive finite-element simulations with rapid predictions from the trained machine learning models, as proposed by Ribeiro et al [41]. Consequently, the fusion of machine learning techniques with finite-element model updating has a high potential impact, not only elevating the accuracy of predictions but also introducing an element of computational efficiency that is indispensable for real-world and complex engineering applications.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These machine learning approaches facilitate the development of data-driven surrogate models capable of approximating the mapping between input parameters and structural responses. The surrogates can significantly expedite the iterative optimization process inherent in model updating by replacing computationally expensive finite-element simulations with rapid predictions from the trained machine learning models, as proposed by Ribeiro et al [41]. Consequently, the fusion of machine learning techniques with finite-element model updating has a high potential impact, not only elevating the accuracy of predictions but also introducing an element of computational efficiency that is indispensable for real-world and complex engineering applications.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two types of learning processes: supervised learning and unsupervised learning. The system will try to anticipate the results based on known samples dataset in supervised learning approach, which is also the most often used training technique [12]. It will compare its own predictions to known goal values, after which it will learn from the errors encountered throughout each cycle.…”
Section: Feed-forward Back-propagation Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizations need to understand the future of digital technologies that fits into current workflows and how they will contribute to new processes [12]. We must always know that hyperautomation is just not meant to substitute people entirely but it automates tasks and frees workers from tedious and pointless duties, permitting them to concentrate on tasks that are more beneficial to the organization [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%