2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress-strain relationship of FRP confined concrete columns under combined axial load and bending moment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameter n should be constant. Recent studies also indicated that the FRP-confinement stiffness, concrete compressive strength, and concrete damage level did not affect the parameter n value [11,12,34,36]. The performance of the n value is shown in Figure 10b, in which AV = 1.01 and IAE = 0.11.…”
Section: Analytical Stress-strain Modelingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Parameter n should be constant. Recent studies also indicated that the FRP-confinement stiffness, concrete compressive strength, and concrete damage level did not affect the parameter n value [11,12,34,36]. The performance of the n value is shown in Figure 10b, in which AV = 1.01 and IAE = 0.11.…”
Section: Analytical Stress-strain Modelingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Many experimental investigations on eccentrically loaded FRP confined columns have been carried out on circular columns [ 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ] and noncircular columns [ 28 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Other investigations [ 29 , 31 , 51 ] focused on finite element modeling (FEM) to investigate the effect of the load eccentricity on FRP-confined concrete columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of this technique are the improvement of the axial strength, strain ductility and energy dissipation capacity of the confined concrete. Thus, the behavior of concrete columns confined with FRP has been extensively studied, leading to a significant number of stress–strain models, some focused on circular cross-sections [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ] and others focused on square and rectangular ones [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. In addition to that, some studies are concentrated on modeling the stress–strain behavior of both circular and non-circular FRP confined concrete columns [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Megalooikonomou and Papavasileiou [ 27 ] also proposed an iterative approach to model both the axial and lateral stress–strain response of square and rectangular FRP-confined RC concrete columns with sparse stirrups, so that the contribution of the stirrups is not taken into account. Except for the studies by Cao et al [ 5 ], Eid and Paultre [ 9 ], Isleem et al [ 10 ] and Wang and Isleem [ 17 ], which refer to columns with internal steel reinforcement, most of these models do not take into account the presence of the internal steel reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%