2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress-strain relationships and modulus of elasticity of rocks and of ordinary and high performance concretes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The concrete was prepared using CEM I 42.5 R Portland cement. The chemical composition of cement was presented in Table 1 , whereas the physical properties were shown in Table 2 [ 38 ]. The optimal value of water/binder ratio and the content of self-compacting concrete were determined experimentally, by preparing multiple test batches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concrete was prepared using CEM I 42.5 R Portland cement. The chemical composition of cement was presented in Table 1 , whereas the physical properties were shown in Table 2 [ 38 ]. The optimal value of water/binder ratio and the content of self-compacting concrete were determined experimentally, by preparing multiple test batches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, for w/b = 0.30 and 0.35, the increases were 27.9% and 36%, respectively. Piasta et al [42] found that the elastic modulus of the high-performance concrete with w/b = 0.28 was 47.1 GPa, whereas the elastic modulus of the concrete with 1% nanosilica showed an increase of 13%, attributed to the effects of nanosilica modification on the microstructure [19]. Because the trend of the results of both fc and Ec were consistent, that is, as the silica fume and nanosilica content were incorporated into the concretes, an improvement in the properties occurred.…”
Section: Compressive Strength (Fc) and Elastic Modulus (Ec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple increase in secondary liner thickness cannot completely control the creep deformation in rock mass. FC-based members embedded between primary support and secondary liner can notably bear deformation pressure, thereby the high compressibility and [36,107,131,167,[194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203][204][205]. [232] was adopted in liner system of Tiefengshan No.…”
Section: Structure Membermentioning
confidence: 99%