2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2208.01611
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress Testing $Λ$CDM with High-redshift Galaxy Candidates

Abstract: Early data from JWST have revealed a bevy of high-redshift galaxy candidates with unexpectedly high stellar masses. I examine these candidates in the context of the most massive galaxies expected in ΛCDM-like models, wherein the stellar mass of a galaxy is limited by the available baryonic reservoir of its host dark matter halo. For a given cosmology, the abundance of dark matter halos as function of mass and redshift sets an absolute upper limit on the number density 𝑛(> 𝑀 ★ , 𝑧) and stellar mass density �… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Boylan-Kolchin (2022) pointed out tension between the estimated galaxy stellar masses (Labbé et al 2022) and those expected in ΛCDM-like models (see also Behroozi & Silk 2018). Our concept in this paper basically follows what they discussed, but in comparison with theoretical models, we adopt UV luminosities, which are more reliable than the stellar-mass estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Recently, Boylan-Kolchin (2022) pointed out tension between the estimated galaxy stellar masses (Labbé et al 2022) and those expected in ΛCDM-like models (see also Behroozi & Silk 2018). Our concept in this paper basically follows what they discussed, but in comparison with theoretical models, we adopt UV luminosities, which are more reliable than the stellar-mass estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…DISCUSSION 4.1. Implications of the z ≈ 17 scenario If CEERS-1749 is confirmed to lie at z ≈ 17, it would force a major revision of early galaxy evolution models, and potentially even our underlying cosmological framework (see, e.g., Steinhardt et al 2016;Mason et al 2022;Boylan-Kolchin 2022). It is very challenging to produce such extraordinarily luminous and massive galaxies only ∼200 Myrs after the Big Bang under standard assumptions in the framework of ΛCDM cosmology (see also the candidates reported in Atek et al 2022;Yan et al 2022).…”
Section: Clues From Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…larger than that obtained byBoylan-Kolchin (2022) due to our consideration of measurement uncertainties in the observed value of M * and to our conservative choice of adopting f b = 0.18, while the latter author adopts f b = 0.158, derived from the best-fit values of the Plank cosmological parameters. The tension is larger for increasing values of w a , thus showing that…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%