2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stressed Out: Reconsidering stress in the study of archaeological human remains

Abstract: The term "stress" remains poorly defined, often misused, and has clearly lost its meaning in the study of archeological human remains. In this special issue we reconsider the use of this term in human remains research, to untangle what we actually mean when we say "stress" in archaeology. To this aim, we looked at this topic from two broad perspectives: dental anthropology and paleopathology. Based on revision of the previous work on this topic, the new contributions of this issue, and in the light of the rapi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the above listed osteoarchaeological markers of potential social status (skeletal occupational markers, markers of physiological stress etc.) suffer from inherent limitations mostly linked to the fact that their expression is multifactorial ( Domett et al, 2017 ; Edinborough and Rando, 2020 ; Michopoulou et al, 2015 ); hence, they should be used critically and in combination when assessing status. Ideally, such skeletal markers should also be used in conjunction with material cultural evidence of social status as a complementary line of evidence (though with its own inherent biases) ( Robb et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Combining Osteoarchaeological Parameters With Dental Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the above listed osteoarchaeological markers of potential social status (skeletal occupational markers, markers of physiological stress etc.) suffer from inherent limitations mostly linked to the fact that their expression is multifactorial ( Domett et al, 2017 ; Edinborough and Rando, 2020 ; Michopoulou et al, 2015 ); hence, they should be used critically and in combination when assessing status. Ideally, such skeletal markers should also be used in conjunction with material cultural evidence of social status as a complementary line of evidence (though with its own inherent biases) ( Robb et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Combining Osteoarchaeological Parameters With Dental Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the word “stress” is somewhat controversial, for example, Edinborough and Rando (2020), we use the term here to refer to physiological disruptions resulting from environmental, nutritional, pathological (illness, disease), or social strains placed on a developing person (Goodman et al, 1984; Goodman & Armelagos, 1989; Goodman & Martin, 2005; Larsen, 2015; Reitsema & McIlvaine, 2014). The children included in this study suffered from physiological disruptions in the form of illness, disease, and nutrient deficiencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress and its direct link to poor or good “health” has been problematized particularly following the osteological paradox (Edinborough & Rando, 2020; Lambert, 2009; Pilloud & Schwitalla, 2020; Wood et al, 1992). For example, Pilloud and Schwitalla (2020) show that biological responses to stress change through time and with different cultural practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%